Flux of the vector field F = (1,1,1)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the flux of the vector field F = (1,1,1) through a surface defined by the equation z = √(x²+y²) within the bounds 1 < z < 2. Participants explore different methods for calculating the flux, including the use of the divergence theorem and parametric equations, while addressing potential errors in reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help on calculating the flux and presents their current progress with an integral.
  • Another suggests using the divergence theorem, noting the surface is a cone.
  • A different participant agrees with using the divergence theorem and provides parametric equations for the cone, detailing the calculation of the flux integral.
  • Some participants challenge the application of the divergence theorem, arguing that there is no enclosed volume, and suggest an alternative method.
  • There is a disagreement regarding the correct interpretation of the surface and whether it encloses a volume, with some asserting it is a frustrum of a cone.
  • Clarifications are made about the bounds of z, with participants correcting each other on the limits of integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the divergence theorem and whether the surface encloses a volume. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach and final answer for the flux calculation.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions about the surface and the interpretation of the bounds for z, which affect the application of the divergence theorem.

squenshl
Messages
468
Reaction score
4
I'm studying for a test.
How do I find the flux of the vector field F = (1,1,1) down through the surface [tex]\sigma[/tex], given by z = [tex]\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex] and 1 < z < 2. The answer is 3pi but have no idea how to get it. I got it down to[tex]\int\int_R[/tex] x+y/[tex]\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex] +1 dA. Now what?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi squenshl! :smile:

(have a sigma: σ and a square-root: √ and an integral: ∫ and a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Use the divergence theorem (Gauss' theorem) :smile:

(oh, and it's a cone :wink:)
 


As tiny-tim says, the simplest thing to do is to use Gauss' theorem and integrate over the volume instead. If you want to do it directly, write the cone in parametric equations, [itex]x= r cos(\theta)[/itex], [itex]y= r sin(\theta)[/itex], [itex]z= r[/itex].

Now we can write each point as the vector [itex]\rho(r,\theta)= r cos(\theta)\vec{i}+ r sin(\theta)\vec{j}+ r\vec{k}[/itex].

The derivatives, [itex]\rho_r= cos(\theta)\vec{i}+ sin(\theta)\vec{j}+ \vec{k}[/itex] and [itex]\rho_\theta= -r sin(\theta)\vec{i}+ r cos(\theta)\vec{j}[/itex] are in the tangent plane at each point and the cross product of the two vectors, [itex]r cos(\theta)\vec{i}+ r sin(\theta)\vec{j}+ r\vec{k}[/itex] is normal to the surface. The "vector differential of surface area" is [itex]d\vec{S}= (r cos(\theta)\vec{i}+ r sin(\theta)\vec{j}+ r\vec{k})drd\theta)[/itex].

(I chose the order of cross product to give a negative z component so the vector is oriented downward since the problem said "down through the surface".)

Since the vector function is [itex]\vec{i}+ \vec{j}+ \vec{k}[/itex] the flux is given by [itex]\int\int (\vec{i}+ \vec{j}+ \vec{k})\cdot(r cos(\theta)\vec{i}+ r sin(\theta)\vec{j}+ r\vec{k})drd\theta))[/itex] or

[tex]\int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi}\int_{r= 1}^2 r( cos(\theta)+ sin(\theta)+ 1) drd\theta[/tex]
([itex]\theta[/itex] runs from 0 to [itex]2\pi[/itex] to go all the way around the cone and r runs from 1 to 2 because z= r and we are told that "1< z< 2".)
 


I'm afraid both of the previous answers have mistakes. First, the Gauss theorem does not apply directly since there is no enclosed volume. So you need the method suggested by Halls, but his rk term in dS should be -rk. His integral leads to [itex]-3\pi[/itex], which I think is correct vs. [itex]3\pi[/itex].
 
LCKurtz said:
First, the Gauss theorem does not apply directly since there is no enclosed volume.

Yes there is … it's the frustrum of a cone. :wink:
 


tiny-tim said:
Yes there is … it's the frustrum of a cone. :wink:

The top and bottom surfaces are not included so it is not a surface enclosing a volume. Of course the answer would be 0 for a constant vector and a closed surface.
 


Cheers.
 
LCKurtz said:
The top and bottom surfaces are not included so it is not a surface enclosing a volume.

oh i see now … I've been reading it as z = 1 and z = 2 :rolleyes:
squenshl said:
… through the surface [tex]\sigma[/tex], given by z = [tex]\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/tex] and 1 < z < 2.
 


Actually it was 1 [tex]\leq[/tex] z [tex]\leq[/tex] 2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K