Flux Problem: Calculate from (4,6) to (2,6)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chadlee88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the flux along a line from (4,6) to (2,6) using the formula for flux, which is the integral of the vector field v dotted with the normal vector n over the path dS. The vector field is defined as v = -yi + xj, and the normal vector is taken as n = j. The user initially computes the integral and arrives at an answer of -6, while the expected correct answer is 6. The discrepancy arises from the assumption regarding the direction of the normal vector, which may need to be reversed to account for the flux direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and flux calculations
  • Familiarity with line integrals in vector calculus
  • Knowledge of parametrization of curves
  • Proficiency in evaluating definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of flux in vector fields
  • Study line integrals and their applications in physics
  • Learn about parametrizing curves in two dimensions
  • Explore the implications of normal vectors in flux calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying vector calculus, particularly those tackling problems involving flux and line integrals, as well as educators looking for examples of common pitfalls in directional assumptions.

Chadlee88
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the flux:
line from (4,6) to (2,6)

using formula: integral v.n dS where v = -yi+xj

n = j
Parametrising:
x = t:
y = 6
Therefore r(t) = ti+6j
r'(t) = i
dS = |r't|dt =>dS = dt

v.n = (-6i+tj) . (j) => t

(As line is going from right to left (4,6) to (2,6))
Lower bound of integration = 4:
Upper bound of integration = 2:

Evaluation:

integral of t dt = t^2/2

therefore Answer is [2^2/2] - [4^2/2] = 2-8 = -6.

The correct answer I'm given is 6 but i don't know where I've gone wrong. could someone please tell me :biggrin:





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on the direction of flux the question is interested in-- by taking n =j, you assumed they were interested in the flux in the +y direction-- maybe the question wanted the flux in the -y direction? (Which would give you the negative of the n you obtained)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K