Foam Flow: Darcy vs NS Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Talal
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Talal
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
According to the attached article, Foam is a Bingham plastic. Darcy's equation with Bingham's extension can be used to describe the flow. My question is, for foam flow, does utilising Darcy's equation a reasonable approach ? What benefits does it have, or better yet, why not use Navier stockes equation ? Also in the attached article foam is treated as a single phase.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Talal said:
According to the attached article, Foam is a Bingham plastic. Darcy's equation with Bingham's extension can be used to describe the flow. My question is, for foam flow, does utilising Darcy's equation a reasonable approach ? What benefits does it have, or better yet, why not use Navier stockes equation ? Also in the attached article foam is treated as a single phase.
The Navier Stokes equations only apply to a Newtonian fluid. This fluid is non-Newtonian, so its pressure drop-flow rate behavior will be different. I have problems with this paper, particularly Eqns. 22 and 23, which are definitely incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Talal
Thank you very much for your answer.