Football Kinematics Homework: Tom Throws Ball to Wes

  • Thread starter Thread starter postfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a physics homework problem involving the kinematics of a football thrown by Tom to Wes. The key points include the analysis of the minimum speed required for the ball to reach Wes, which is determined to be sqrt(gL) when the launch angle is set to 45 degrees. The discussion also evaluates the correctness of multiple statements regarding the relationship between launch speed, distance, and time of flight. The incorrect statement identified is (A), which asserts that if vmax < sqrt(gl), the ball cannot reach Wes at all, thus confirming its validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of projectile motion equations
  • Learn about the effects of launch angle on projectile range
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques in physics
  • Investigate the relationship between velocity, distance, and time in projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics, educators teaching projectile motion concepts, and anyone preparing for physics examinations involving motion analysis.

postfan
Messages
259
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Tom throws a football to Wes, who is a distance l away. Tom can control the time of flight t of the ball by choosing
any speed up to vmax and any launch angle between 0◦ and 90◦
. Ignore air resistance and assume Tom and Wes
are at the same height. Which of the following statements is incorrect?
(A) If vmax <√gl, the ball cannot reach Wes at all.
(B) Assuming the ball can reach Wes, as vmax increases with l held fixed, the minimum value of t decreases.
(C) Assuming the ball can reach Wes, as vmax increases with l held fixed, the maximum value of t increases.
(D) Assuming the ball can reach Wes, as l increases with vmax held fixed, the minimum value of t increases.
(E) Assuming the ball can reach Wes, as l increases with vmax held fixed, the maximum value of t increases.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that making the launch angle closest to 45 degrees and increasing the horizontal component of the velocity will reduce the time, but I don't know where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a multiple choice question. And it says "which is incorrect?" So start in checking them.

First, can you check the minimum speed required for the ball to reach? What does that tell you about (A)?

Note that the rest of the statements talk about minimum t and maximum t. Can you work out the min and max times given a vmax and an l? You might have to do some fiddling around there since in principle the max or min could arise from a throwing velocity less than vmax. Once you know how he min and max depend on vmax and l, you should be able to check statements (B) through (E).
 
I found the minimum velocity required to be sqrt(g*L/sin(2*theta)) and assuming theta=45degrees (maximizing sin(2*theta) v=sqrt(gL) making (A) true and not the right answer. The question is how do I work out the min and max times/
 
postfan said:
how do I work out the min and max times/
By finding the general expression for the time in terms of l and v.
 
Setting g=10 I got t=L/(v_0*cos(theta) and t=v_0*sin(theta)/5 . I then set them equal to each other and got 5L=v_0^2*sin(theta)*cos(theta). However I don't see how I can derive with a min and max time from that.
 
postfan said:
5L=v_0^2*sin(theta)*cos(theta)
You seem to have an extra factor of 2 from somewhere. I think you mean gL=v02*2sin(theta)*cos(theta)= v02*sin(2 theta).
Trouble is, you've eliminated t, which you wanted to find the extrema of. You want t as a function of v, eliminating theta.
 
Last edited:
The 2 that I have is a exponent of v_0 not a multiplicative factor.
 
postfan said:
The 2 that I have is a exponent of v_0 not a multiplicative factor.
OK, I see. That's a hazard of not using superscripts. Conversely, I missed out a factor of 2, now edited in.
Anyway, as I wrote, you want to eliminate theta, not t, to answer the question.
 
How do I eliminate theta? I tried some algebraic manipulation but to no avail.
 
  • #10
postfan said:
How do I eliminate theta? I tried some algebraic manipulation but to no avail.
Cos2+sin2=1.
 
  • #11
Ok I got v_0^2=5t^2+L^2/t^2. How's that?
 
  • #12
postfan said:
Ok I got v_0^2=5t^2+L^2/t^2. How's that?
Not quite right. Had you kept g instead of substituting 10, you might have noticed the gt2 term has the wrong dimension.
Once you've corrected it, solve for t as a function of v. Yes, I know it's a quartic, but it's actually quite easy to solve.
 
  • #13
Ok I got gt^4-4v^2+4L^2=0. How is that?
 
  • #14
postfan said:
Ok I got gt^4-4v^2+4L^2=0. How is that?
Same flaw, only worse.
Are you familiar with dimensional analysis? You write M for mass, L for distance, T for time, Q for charge etc. and reduce every term to a combination of these. Ignore constants.
Applying that here, gt^4 has dimension (LT-2)T4 = LT2. v^2 has dimension (LT-1)2 = L2T-2. l^2 has dimension L2. Terms which are to be added together all need to match.
This shows you have mistakes in your algebra.
Your original equations, t=L/(v_0*cos(theta)) and t=2v_0*sin(theta)/g, are dimensionally correct.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K