For Dummies Derivation of Radiation Pressure>Energy Density?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the radiation pressure formula in n-dimensional space, specifically examining the relationship between radiation pressure (P) and internal energy density (u). Participants explore various derivations, implications, and the dimensionality of pressure in different contexts, including theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants present a derivation of the radiation pressure formula P = u/n based on the behavior of light in an n-dimensional cube, discussing momentum changes and average force calculations.
  • Others propose that the electromagnetic field's properties lead to a conservation law that relates energy density and pressure, specifically stating that for thermal radiation, u - nP = 0.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of dimensionality on the units of pressure, energy density, and volume, questioning whether these units remain compatible with other thermodynamic quantities.
  • There is mention of the Maxwell stress tensor and its relation to deriving the radiation pressure formula, with requests for further reading on this topic.
  • Some participants note that the concept of pressure may differ in higher dimensions, suggesting that it may not always be characterized as force per unit area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of dimensionality for pressure and energy density units, and there are multiple competing views regarding the derivation methods and their interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the potential limitations in understanding the implications of dimensionality on physical quantities and the need for further exploration of the relationships between derived quantities in different dimensions.

tade
Messages
720
Reaction score
26
The formula for the radiation pressure P in n-dimensional space for a given internal energy density u is ##\frac{u}{n}##.

I would really appreciate it if someone could provide a link that gives a simple derivation of this formula for dummies like me.
 
Science news on Phys.org
tade said:
The formula for the radiation pressure P in n-dimensional space for a given internal energy density u is ##\frac{u}{n}##.

I would really appreciate it if someone could provide a link that gives a simple derivation of this formula for dummies like me.

Here's my (possibly bogus) derivation: Consider a n-dimensional cube of sides L. Its "volume" is L^n. Its "area" is 2 n L^{n-1}. (Why is that? Well, a one-dimensional version of a cube is just a line. Its border consists of 2 points. A two-dimensional cube is just a square. Its border consists of 4 lines. A three-dimensional cube is a regular cube. Its border consists of 6 squares. The general case is that a n-dimensional cube has a border consisting of 2 x n faces, of which is a (n-1)-dimensional cube.)

So now imagine a single little packet of light at the center of an n-dimensional cube (with a "surface" made out of mirrors). It just bounces back and forth between the faces. Let's consider the case where the light is traveling in the x-direction. Then immediately before bouncing off the "face" that is perpendicular to the x-direction, its momentum in the x-direction is p = E/c (because the energy-momentum relationship for electromagnetic energy is E = pc). Immediately after bouncing off, the momentum is p = -E/c. The change in momentum is then -2E/c. That means that the packet of light imparts a momentum change of +2E/c to the mirror. Since the packet has to travel from one side of the cube to the other between bounces, and it travels at speed c, these bounces happen once every L/c units of time. So the average force imparted on the mirrors by the light packet is:

F = \frac{\delta p}{\delta t} = \frac{2E/c}{L/c} = 2E/L

Since pressure is force per unit area, you calculate the average pressure as the force F over the area A:

P = \frac{F}{A} = \frac{2E/L}{2 n L^{n-1}} = \frac{E}{n L^n}

Since the volume is given by V = L^n, we can write this as:

P = \frac{E}{n V}

Since the energy density is u = E/V, this means:

P = \frac{u}{n}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tade
Another explanation is that the free electromagnetic field (as a massless vector field) doesn't contain any length or energy scale. That's why the action is invariant under scaling the coordinates and fields. The consequence is a conserved Noether currrent, and the conservation law just says that the covariant trace of the energy-momentum-stress tensor of the em. field vanishes: ##T_{\mu}^{\mu}=0##, but for a homogeneous situation (e.g., for thermal radiation) this means that ##u-nP=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tade
stevendaryl said:
Here's my (possibly bogus) derivation: Consider a n-dimensional cube of sides L. Its "volume" is L^n. Its "area" is 2 n L^{n-1}. (Why is that? Well, a one-dimensional version of a cube is just a line. Its border consists of 2 points. A two-dimensional cube is just a square. Its border consists of 4 lines. A three-dimensional cube is a regular cube. Its border consists of 6 squares. The general case is that a n-dimensional cube has a border consisting of 2 x n faces, of which is a (n-1)-dimensional cube.)

So now imagine a single little packet of light at the center of an n-dimensional cube (with a "surface" made out of mirrors). It just bounces back and forth between the faces. Let's consider the case where the light is traveling in the x-direction. Then immediately before bouncing off the "face" that is perpendicular to the x-direction, its momentum in the x-direction is p = E/c (because the energy-momentum relationship for electromagnetic energy is E = pc). Immediately after bouncing off, the momentum is p = -E/c. The change in momentum is then -2E/c. That means that the packet of light imparts a momentum change of +2E/c to the mirror. Since the packet has to travel from one side of the cube to the other between bounces, and it travels at speed c, these bounces happen once every L/c units of time. So the average force imparted on the mirrors by the light packet is:

F = \frac{\delta p}{\delta t} = \frac{2E/c}{L/c} = 2E/L

Since pressure is force per unit area, you calculate the average pressure as the force F over the area A:

P = \frac{F}{A} = \frac{2E/L}{2 n L^{n-1}} = \frac{E}{n L^n}

Since the volume is given by V = L^n, we can write this as:

P = \frac{E}{n V}

Since the energy density is u = E/V, this means:

P = \frac{u}{n}

The units of pressure will no longer be the same in higher dimensions though. Is that supposed to be the case?
 
tade said:
The units of pressure will no longer be the same in higher dimensions though. Is that supposed to be the case?

I think that the analogous notion of "pressure" does have different units in different numbers of dimensions. For example, in 2-D, you have a square with particles inside bouncing off the sides of the square. It wouldn't really make sense to characterize the pressure of the particles hitting the sides of the square in terms of force per unit area--the relevant number is force per unit length of the boundary.
 
stevendaryl said:
I think that the analogous notion of "pressure" does have different units in different numbers of dimensions. For example, in 2-D, you have a square with particles inside bouncing off the sides of the square. It wouldn't really make sense to characterize the pressure of the particles hitting the sides of the square in terms of force per unit area--the relevant number is force per unit length of the boundary.
I see.

This shows the derivation of the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefa...80.93Boltzmann.27s_law_in_n-dimensional_space

Am I right to say that the altered units of P, u and V are still dimensionally (units-wise) compatible with the other thermodynamic quantities of T, S, U and Q in this derivation?
 
vanhees71 said:
Another explanation is that the free electromagnetic field (as a massless vector field) doesn't contain any length or energy scale. That's why the action is invariant under scaling the coordinates and fields. The consequence is a conserved Noether currrent, and the conservation law just says that the covariant trace of the energy-momentum-stress tensor of the em. field vanishes: ##T_{\mu}^{\mu}=0##, but for a homogeneous situation (e.g., for thermal radiation) this means that ##u-nP=0##.
I'm going to ask a dummy question; does this method say anything about the units of u and P?
 
In the Wikipedia article posted above, they write that the formula "follows from the Maxwell stress tensor of classical electrodynamics".
vanhees71 said:
Another explanation is that the free electromagnetic field (as a massless vector field) doesn't contain any length or energy scale. That's why the action is invariant under scaling the coordinates and fields. The consequence is a conserved Noether currrent, and the conservation law just says that the covariant trace of the energy-momentum-stress tensor of the em. field vanishes: ##T_{\mu}^{\mu}=0##, but for a homogeneous situation (e.g., for thermal radiation) this means that ##u-nP=0##.
which I think is the same as what vanhees71 has said.Steven's derivation relies on the E=pc relation from Special Relativity though.
stevendaryl said:
...its momentum in the x-direction is p = E/c (because the energy-momentum relationship for electromagnetic energy is E = pc).
vanhees, could you recommend any reading material that details the derivation from the stress tensor? I would like to compare the two methods.
 
tade said:
I see.

This shows the derivation of the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan–Boltzmann_law#Stefan.E2.80.93Boltzmann.27s_law_in_n-dimensional_space

Am I right to say that the altered units of P, u and V are still dimensionally (units-wise) compatible with the other thermodynamic quantities of T, S, U and Q in this derivation?

The thermodynamic equation dU = TdS - PdV shows that pressure has units \frac{energy}{volume}. Energy has units (mass)(distance)2(time)-2. Volume has units (distance)n for n-dimensional space. So that means that pressure has units: (mass)(distance)2-n(time)-2. For 3-D this means the units:

(mass)(distance)-1(time)-2

which is the same as (force)/(area) = [(mass) (distance) (time)-2] (distance)-2
 
  • #10
stevendaryl said:
The thermodynamic equation dU = TdS - PdV shows that pressure has units \frac{energy}{volume}. Energy has units (mass)(distance)2(time)-2. Volume has units (distance)n for n-dimensional space. So that means that pressure has units: (mass)(distance)2-n(time)-2. For 3-D this means the units:

(mass)(distance)-1(time)-2

which is the same as (force)/(area) = [(mass) (distance) (time)-2] (distance)-2
Sorry, I was asking if the units were compatible with T, S, U and Q for any number of dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K