What causes the force of attraction between two permanent magnets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter so-crates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Magnets
AI Thread Summary
The force of attraction between two permanent magnets is primarily due to the net magnetic field created by unpaired electron spins, rather than moving charges as described by F = qv x B. In most materials, atomic currents are randomly oriented, resulting in a net force of zero, but in ferromagnetic materials, these currents can become organized, leading to a net magnetic force. The electrons, particularly the valence electrons, are bound to the atoms and contribute to the magnetism through their spins, which act as magnetic dipoles. The strength of the magnetic field produced by these dipoles decreases with the cube of the distance between them, and the interaction can be described by the potential energy of a dipole in a magnetic field. Ultimately, the forces between these dipoles are rooted in the principles of the Lorentz force.
so-crates
Messages
293
Reaction score
0
What causes the force of attraction between two permanent magnets? I'm well aware that F = qv x B, but what charges are moving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Charges are moving at the atomic level. In most materials the atomic currents (i.e. from spin & angular momentum) are randomly oriented so the net force is zero. However, in some materials, the atomic currents can become organized (correlated) on a macroscopic level and allow for a net magnetic force on the material.
 
So it is the valence electrons in the metal, and not the nuclei? If it just the electrons, why does this cause a force on the entire piece of metal and not just cause a current to flow ?
 
so-crates said:
So it is the valence electrons in the metal, and not the nuclei? If it just the electrons, why does this cause a force on the entire piece of metal and not just cause a current to flow ?

The electrons are bound to the atoms.
 
Magnetism in permanent magnets results from the net magnetic field created by unpaired electron spins. These are not necessarily moving; some of the magnetism can come from orbital motion, but this is not the main effect. Electron spins are dipoles and there is a force law between these spins that is proportional to the magnetic moment of each and to the reciprocal of the cube of the separation. This force law is not F=qvxB.
 
krab said:
Electron spins are dipoles and there is a force law between these spins that is proportional to the magnetic moment of each and to the reciprocal of the cube of the separation. This force law is not F=qvxB.

Actually, the strength of the magnetic field produced by the dipole varies inversely with the cube of distance and the potential energy of a dipole in a magnetic field is U = -\vec \mu \cdot \vec B so the force exerted by one dipole on the other will vary as the gradient of U.

BTW - if we think about the magnetic moment of an electron classically then it amounts to a rotating charge, i.e. it constitutes an electrical current. Ultimately, these notions and forces between dipoles derive from the basic Lorentz force.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top