Force Components, Friction, etc. Check my work?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the force required to pull a sled up a slope, given specific parameters such as mass, coefficient of static friction, and the angle of the slope. The original poster seeks verification of their calculations and understanding of the underlying physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations related to the force needed to overcome friction and the effects of the applied force's components on the normal force. There is a focus on the implications of the applied force not acting at the center of gravity of the sled.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning, questioning assumptions, and clarifying concepts. There is acknowledgment of differing results and an exploration of the factors affecting the normal force and friction.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's upcoming midterm, indicating a time constraint for understanding the material. The discussion also touches on the implications of the applied force's direction and point of application on the sled's motion.

Summer95
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
LqZ7Pwe.jpg


Could someone credible please check my work on this one?

Homework Statement


This problem is "pulling a sled up a slope"
All relevant data is in the picture. I wanted to find FP (The force one has to pull to start the sled moving up with slope).

mass = 26.0kg
μs = 0.096
slope of hill = 12 degrees
FP = 23 degrees (from horizontal)

I did all my work in the rotated reference frame where the x direction is in line with the slope of the hill.

Homework Equations


I fully believe I got the right answer which is why I want this to be double and triple checked to make sure I really do understand everything here. I have my midterm on Friday so now is the time to learn!

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution I got was FP = 76.9N

Thank you so much in advance! <3‿<3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got a slightly higher number. To wit, 78.4N.

I notice a term μsFpsin(11) in your work which I did not have.
 
rude man said:
I got a slightly higher number. To wit, 78.4N.

I notice a term μsFpsin(11) in your work which I did not have.

Thanks for replying :) I see exactly what you did differently so I'll explain and can you tell me where/if I wrong in the following?

To find the Ffriction it is dependent on FN which ordinarily would be equal to the y component of Fg. However, there is also a y component to FP (an applied force in the y direction) which reduces FN by FPY. In other words because you are pulling up on the object the normal force is reduced. If this were not the case there would be a net force in the y direction and it would accelerate off the slope. That is where μsFpsin(11) in my work comes from. It is part of 0.096[mgcos(12)-FPsin(11)] where FPsin(11) is the y component of the applied force FP.
 
Well, guess what, I agree! Except one thing bothers me: the force Fpsin(11) is not applied at the c.g. of the sled, but at one edge. So the tendency of that vertical component of Fp is to tilt the sled upwards rather than lift it evenly off the ramp. So the part of the surface contact the sled makes with the ramp that is closest to the rope will get "lighter" but the part on the low end will hardly be affected. I guess you can say it averages out. Certainly I was remiss in neglecting that vertical component. So congrats! I'd say the apprentice beat the master except I'm no master!
 
Thanks! That is an interesting point. Would it balance out perfectly or would that factor into a more accurate answer?
 
I think it would balance out and your analysis was spot-on.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
13K