Force delivered by a punch: Question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BriK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around calculating the force delivered by a punch, specifically focusing on the contributions of various energy components such as potential, kinetic, and rotational energy. Participants explore the physics involved in a punch, including the moment of inertia of the torso and arm, and the implications of body mechanics during the punch.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for total energy (Et) that includes potential, kinetic, and rotational energy components, but questions the origin of the angular velocity value of 1.9.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the mass values used in calculations, noting a discrepancy between the mass of the torso and the arm.
  • Some participants discuss the role of the torso's mass in the moment of inertia calculation, suggesting it contributes to the rotational energy even though it is not directly thrown.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of the total energy calculation, with different participants arriving at varying results.
  • One participant proposes segmenting the torso into sections to better account for the twisting motion and its effect on the punch's energy delivery.
  • Another participant suggests that modeling the body as a skeleton might provide a more accurate representation than using simplified shapes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and assumptions made regarding the energy components of the punch. There is no consensus on the correct value for the total energy or the origin of the angular velocity value, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the assumptions made regarding the direction of the punch (upward or downward) and the use of specific values in calculations without clear explanations. The discussion reflects a variety of interpretations and approaches to modeling the physics of a punch.

BriK
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out the force delivered behind a right rear hand punch as you twist your hips and shoulders into the punch. I have looked at several sources to find most of the information but I am stuck on one part and would appreciate any help.

I found an article that helped me determine the approximate moment of inertia (I) for that of a thin wide rectangle (kind of shaped like a glass) with the top being the torso shoulders and the narrower bottom being the torso waist:

I = 1/12 M (d1^2 + d2^2)

d1 = the distance from center of torso to the edge of the shoulder
d2 = the distance from the center of the torso to the outer edge of the back

Assume: M = 35 kg, d1 = 0.22 m, d2= 0.07 m

Therefore: I = 0.1554 kg*m^2

Find total energy (Et) by adding the potential (Ep), kinetic (Ek) and rotational (Er) components:

Et = Ep + Ek + Er = m*g*h + 0.5*m*v^2 + 0.5*I*w^2

m = M = mass, assume arm is 8 kg
g = gravitational acceleration = 9.8 m/sec^2
h = height, assume slightly downward punch of 0.16 meters
v = velocity of the punch, assume 7.3 m/sec
w = angular velocity

The article I found then has this equation:

Et = (8 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.16 m) + 0.5(8 kg)(7.3 m/s)^2 + 0.5(0.1554 kg m^2)(1.9^2/0.22^2) = 207.03 Joules

I can see where all parts come from but the 1.9 valve.
The 1.9 is in the term for angular velocity, which is: w = velocity/radius

Can anyone tell me where 1.9 comes from, or is information missing?

Thanks in advance for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
firstly, is m =M = 8 Kg or is M=35 Kg?
also the final value for Et (when you put numbers in calculator) is not 207.03J
is 0.22 your radius?
 
35kg is the torso mass but that is not thrown at the opponent...just the 8kg mass of the arm is thrown at the opponents with the torso twisting into it...

Yes...d1 and d2 are radius values...
 
Yes the total doesn't add up for me either, its off by a good bit from the 207 J value given in the article I am looking at...

Et = (8 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.16 m) + 0.5(8 kg)(7.3 m/s)^2 + 0.5(0.1554 kg m^2)(1.9^2/0.22^2)
Et = 12.544 + 213.16 + 0.013576 = 225.72 Is what I get...
 
ok why is 35 used for moment of inertia calculation? isn't the arm is moving only? which I assume is 8Kg right?
 
how did you get 0.013576?
 
I misspoke, kind of...

The torso (35kg) is twisting, not being thrown like the fist/arm, thereby lengthening the punch reach and adding in a rotational energy...The 35kg is used to find the moment of inertia as a component to find the rotational energy...

Yes, the arm is 8kg...

You are correct also 0.5(0.1554 kg m^2)(1.9^2/0.22^2) = 5.8

I have been wondering if the mgh may be negative as I am not sure if the punch is going upward or downward...
 
i 've found it difficult to imagine what the system actually looks like.
anyway, i think you are on right track with this problem. perhaps don't worry too much about reproducing what other has but instead do the calculation yourself with your own diagrams and assumptions
 
BriK said:
I misspoke, kind of...

The torso (35kg) is twisting, not being thrown like the fist/arm, thereby lengthening the punch reach and adding in a rotational energy...The 35kg is used to find the moment of inertia as a component to find the rotational energy...

mmm... then perhaps the 1.9 comes from how quickly the torso is twisted?

and yeah perhpas the punch would go downward...
 
  • #10
Here is a link to the paper I am looking at for a reference...it may help to see the setup...

http://www.phys.ttu.edu/~cmyles/Phys5306/Papers/2004/Physics of Martial Arts.doc

Seems to make sense to me, but I cannot explain where the 1.9 value comes from...but yes it could be velocity of twisting...has to be I think, because angular velocity, w=v/r...but becuae he does not explain it I am shying away from guessing at it I guess...
 
  • #11
Here is another link that uses the same formula to define a straight punch (no twisting torso)...so the rotational energy is real low...

http://www.pims.math.ca/pi/issue6/page09-11.pdf

But he uses "5 pi" for angular velocity...with the fist rotating 180degrees as it extends to completion...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
looking at the first document, it appears that they did use -mgh for their first example, and I don't see why they would change it to +mgh in the rotational case, so I assume that one of them must have been a typo. I guess is that the latter is wrong. now, as far as 1.9 goes, they did not specify how they get that, but judging by the way they have been presenting the article, I guess that 1.9 is just some typical values one would use. Like the 8Kg, 7cm etc... no big deal. the ideas they were trying to get across were simply the concepts of how to account for all variables in the setup.
 
  • #13
if you look at the numbers:
12.544, 213.16 and 5.8
you can see also that the rot energy 5.8 is fairly small by comparsion, so I guess not a surprise
 
  • #14
One other thought about the torso twisting into the punch...

As you twist not all portions of the torso turn the same amount...plus, if I lift my elbow I increase the diameter at my shoulders out to the length to reach my elbows...so I was thinking, if I segment the torso into several pieces and assume each section twists a portion of the full rotation with each portion above the last going further until the shoulders out to the elbows swing the full distance...that increases the radisu if the uppermost portion of the torso as it adds the length of the arms thru the shoulders to the elbows increasing the rotational portion of the energy calculation...

So I segment the torso and calculate the moment of inertia and rotational energy for each section with the final section being the shoulders out to the elbows...then add all of these for the total rotational portion...

I am thinking I need to do this because I know from experience throwing punches that a hooking rear hand roundhouse type of puch feels to have a larger impact...

Comments?
 
  • #15
I guess if you go that far in analysing the situation, you may as well model the body using a skeleton instead of slices of rectangles and rods.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K