Force on a rod attached to a pivot

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter albertrichardf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Pivot Rod
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the horizontal force on a pivot from a rod with a weight attached, specifically a 2 kg weight at a height of 0.4 m. The user initially calculated the horizontal force as 9.4 N using trigonometric components of the weight, while Feynman's reasoning suggests the correct horizontal force is 14.7 N, derived from the relationship W tan ø. The discrepancy arises from the understanding of how forces interact in the system, particularly the need for the net force to align parallel to the rod.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts including forces and pivots
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions such as sine and cosine
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Ability to analyze free body diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in physics
  • Learn about free body diagrams and their applications in force analysis
  • Explore the concept of torque and its relationship to pivot points
  • Investigate the implications of Feynman's principles in practical physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding force dynamics in systems involving pivots and weights.

albertrichardf
Messages
165
Reaction score
11
Hello.
Can anyone help me confirm the following from the Feynman tips on physics:
View attachment 111741
The above diagram shows two rods, with a weight attached (the square). Each rod has a pivot attached, though the pivot on the left is fixed and cannot roll. The weight is 2 kg, and the rod is 0.5 m long. The question is to find the horizontal force on the right pivot when the weight is 0.4 m from the ground. Both rods exert a force such that the net vertical component balances the weight but for the following pretend that the rod with the moving pivot bears all the weight.

My reasoning is as follows: the weight exerts a vertical force on the rod. Part of this force is parallel to the rod and part is perpendicular. The rod transfers any parallel force to the pivot, and rotates under the effect of the perpendicular force. For our purposes, the perpendicular force can be ignored. The vertical component of the parallel force can also be ignored because that is balanced by the ground. The horizontal component of the parallel force is thus what is being looked for.

The parallel component is W cos ø, where W is the weight of the mass (2 * 9.8) and ø is the angle. The horizontal component is W cos ø sin ø. All this comes from trigonometry. Therefore the total horizontal force is about 9.4 N.However, Feynman reasons that the net force must be parallel to the rod. Because of the weight pushing onto the rod, the rod feels a vertical force, which it exerts on the pivot. The horizontal force on the pivot is also felt by the rod and must be such that the net force is directed parallel to the rod. In other words, the vertical and horizontal forces form right triangle with the net force as the hypotenuse. The horizontal force is then
W tan ø = 14.7

So I got 9.4 but he got 14.7. Can someone explain to me why I am wrong? Also in his explanation, if the rod feels only a vertical force due to the weight, where does the horizontal force on the pivot come from?

Thanks for answering
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K