Force-free, axisymmetric magnetic field in MHD

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the characteristics of force-free, axisymmetric magnetic fields in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). It establishes that a force-free condition implies the relationship \(\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \alpha \mathbf{B}\), where \(\alpha\) is a scalar field. The axisymmetric magnetic field can be expressed as \(\mathbf{B} = \nabla \psi \times \nabla \phi + B_{\phi} \mathbf{e}_{\phi}\). The complexity of inserting this expression into the force-free condition raises the question of whether a simpler approach exists. The reference to Mestel's work highlights the equations governing the poloidal and toroidal components of the magnetic field in this context.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
Homework Statement
Show that a force-free, axisymmetric field has ##B_{\phi} = f(\psi)/R## in cylindrical polars, where ##f## is an arbitrary function and ##\psi(R,z) = rA_{\phi}(R,z)## is the poloidal flux function, and find the equation satisfied by ##\psi##.
Relevant Equations
##-\nabla^2 \mathbf{B} = \lambda^2 \mathbf{B}##
Force free: ##\mathbf{J} \times \mathbf{B} \sim (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \times \mathbf{B} = 0##
(N.B. MHD applies so ##\epsilon_0|\partial \mathbf{E}/\partial t|/|\mathbf{J}| \ll 1##).

Axisymmetric: can write ##\mathbf{B} = \nabla \psi \times \nabla \phi + B_{\phi} \mathbf{e}_{\phi}##
(##\phi## is the azimuthal coordinate i.e. ##\nabla \phi = \mathbf{e}_{\phi}/r##)

Inserting into ##(\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) \times \mathbf{B} = 0## gives a bit of a mess. Is there an easier route?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the cross-product of two vectors is zero, then those vectors are scalar multiples of each other. Hence a force-free field satisfies \nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \alpha\mathbf{B} for some scalar field \alpha, which (taking the divergence of the above with \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0) must satisfy <br /> \mathbf{B} \cdot \nabla \alpha = 0. Mestel, Stellar Magnetism (2nd ed) at 58ff gives the equations satisfied by the poloidal and toroidal components of \mathbf{B} in the axisymmetric case.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and ergospherical
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...