Force, Friction, Feel like I am not given sufficient info

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a railroad car loaded with crates and examines the conditions under which the crates will slide due to the train's deceleration. The coefficient of static friction is given, along with the initial speed of the train, but there is a noted absence of mass and normal force in the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of not having mass or normal force provided, questioning how to approach the problem with only the coefficient of static friction. Some suggest assuming a mass for convenience, while others explore the idea that mass may not be necessary for the calculations.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the role of mass in the problem. Some participants have offered methods that involve assuming a mass, while others express uncertainty about the relevance of mass in determining whether the crates will slide.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may be constrained by the lack of specific information such as mass and normal force, which are typically essential in friction-related problems. There is also a discussion about how varying the mass of the crates might affect the sliding condition, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the underlying physics principles.

1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



The floor of a railroad car is loaded with loose crates, having a coefficient of static friction of 0.25 with the floor. If the train is initially moving at a speed of 48 km/h, in how short of a distance can the train be stopped without causing the crates to slide? (constant acceleration.)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I've worked the entirety of this chapter's problems and this is literally number 5 out of ten dozen. Can someone explain to me how I am supposed to go about this without mass or a normal force? I don't know what to do with just a coefficient of static friction..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



The floor of a railroad car is loaded with loose crates, having a coefficient of static friction of 0.25 with the floor. If the train is initially moving at a speed of 48 km/h, in how short of a distance can the train be stopped without causing the crates to slide? (constant acceleration.)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've worked the entirety of this chapter's problems and this is literally number 5 out of ten dozen. Can someone explain to me how I am supposed to go about this without mass or a normal force? I don't know what to do with just a coefficient of static friction..

Method #1. Since you are not given the mass of the crate(s), it clearly doesn't matter - so assume a nice convenient figure like 14 kg. [I always like any assumed mass to be even, so that fractions are not introduced when you calculate Kinetic Energy. 2 x 7 is good, since 7 is a prime number so you are not likely to get an incorrect answer by co-incidence. [note that 2+2 = 2x2 so you can get the correct answer by coincidence when working with just a 2]
As you go through the problem you will find you alternately multiply and divide by this mass showing it didn't matter what value you chose.

Method #2. Let the mass of the crate(s) be M. As you work through the problem you will find that M cancels out - so you will get a "number only" answer in the end.
 
I got it, I just called normal force mg, so acceleration needed to overcome max static friction was equal to ug.

Seems like weight matters in this case though. Wouldn't those crates be less likely to slide if I put 500kg of mass in them?
 
1MileCrash said:
I got it, I just called normal force mg, so acceleration needed to overcome max static friction was equal to ug.

Seems like weight matters in this case though. Wouldn't those crates be less likely to slide if I put 500kg of mass in them?

I might seem like the mas mattered, but your physics calculation just showed it doesn't. have faith! Trust the Force [calculation] Luke!
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K