Force I: Newton's Second Law in Inertial & Accel. Frames

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steven Wang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Property
AI Thread Summary
In Newton's second law, the equation F=m*a applies consistently in inertial frames, while pseudo-forces arise only in non-inertial frames. Real forces remain unchanged across different frames, similar to how temperature is consistent regardless of the observer's position. When observing a ping pong game from a NASA centrifuge, the perception of the game differs depending on whether one is in an inertial or non-inertial frame. The dynamics of the game will appear altered due to the effects of the centrifuge's acceleration. Understanding the distinction between real forces and pseudo-forces is crucial in analyzing motion across various frames.
Steven Wang
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have a problem, in Newton's second law F=m*a in inertial frame. In the accelerated frame a mass should be affected by a inertial force, but the force in the original inertial frame don't change, so real force is just like the temperature and will be the same in different frames?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the real forces are the same in any frame. But inertial pseudo-forces only appear when viewing motion from a non-inertial frame.
 
Thank you !
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, the real forces are the same in any frame. But inertial pseudo-forces only appear when viewing motion from a non-inertial frame.
If I were in a NASA centrifuge and viewing a ping pong game in the Earth's inertial frame (neglecting coreolis forces), would the game look the same if I were in an inertial frame, and the game were being played in the centrifuge?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Back
Top