Force of a full body jerk (myoclonic jerk)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter freexd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Force Jerk
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the force generated by a full body jerk, commonly experienced as a myoclonic jerk. Participants explore the complexities of measuring this force, the muscles involved, and the challenges in quantifying such movements. The conversation touches on theoretical considerations, physiological parameters, and the difficulty of arriving at a definitive estimate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the force generated during a full body jerk and suggest that measuring it accurately is challenging.
  • One participant mentions that the maximum forces produced by muscles could provide an upper limit for understanding the force involved.
  • Another participant suggests that the back and neck muscles are primarily involved and estimates that jerks may reach about 10-20% of the muscles' maximum force.
  • There is a proposal to use the formula f = m×a to estimate force, but some participants argue that this may not apply due to the complexity of muscle forces and leverage.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to describe the forces involved and highlights that the body does not move in a single direction, complicating the measurement of total force.
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of providing a single numerical estimate for the force of a jerk, suggesting that it may not be possible without a clearer definition of the question.
  • Concerns are raised about the usefulness of a single number to characterize the strength of the jerk, with references to how such numbers are often presented in media.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that measuring the force of a full body jerk is complex and that there is no consensus on a single numerical estimate. Multiple competing views on how to approach the problem remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of force, the complexity of muscle interactions, and the challenges in measuring forces in vivo. There is also uncertainty regarding the applicability of standard physics formulas in this context.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying biomechanics, physiology, or neurology, as well as individuals curious about the mechanics of muscle movements and their effects on the body.

freexd
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I would like to know how much force a full body jerk creates. You've probably all experienced this, when you were just about to sleep in, when suddenly your whole body jerks.

I know that it is probably very difficult to measure the force excactly. But what might be the probable range?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
freexd said:
I would like to know how much force a full body jerk creates.
Force where exactly? You can look up at the maximal forces that muscles can produce, to get an idea of an upper limit. But it's difficult to measure those forces in vivo during a seizure. EMG can give you a rough estimate if well calibrated.
 
Yes, of course the first question must be which muscels are even involved. And secondly their maximum force is decisive.

I would say, from my experience that in most cases the muscles of the back and neck are primarily involved. I found the info that jerks are about 10-20% of the muscles maximum force.

You are right, the question is now how to measure this properly. My idea would be - how much weight can an average person lift with the back and neck?
I would estimate about 150lbs.

Then the formula f = m×a could be applied. Is that correct so far?
 
freexd said:
My idea would be - how much weight can an average person lift with the back and neck?
I would estimate about 150lbs.

Then the formula f = m×a could be applied. Is that correct so far?

The external forces the body creates are very different from the muscle forces, because of leverage. And F=ma is not useful here at all.

You should rather look for literature on muscle parameters like maximal force, or physiological cross sectional area and maximal muscle stress (multiply the later two to get maximal force).
 
Wow that's a lot more complicated then. One has to determine the force of each single muscle involved in the movement.

Regarding that, I would be glad if you could give me at least some estimatations. When we take for instance 1000N as number, would that be probable? I have not the imagination how strong 1000N is, like you probably have.
 
freexd said:
I would be glad if you could give me at least some estimatations.
Of what? You still haven't said which forces you are interested in.
 
Because I don't know how to describe it. The muscels cause the whole body to move. The body weighs a certain weight. To move the body the muscels have to create a certain amount force.
 
freexd said:
Because I don't know how to describe it. The muscels cause the whole body to move. The body weighs a certain weight. To move the body the muscels have to create a certain amount force.

The whole body does not move in a single direction with a single acceleration. Instead you have a multitude of little forces acting in various directions. There is no one right way to summarize all of that information into a single number that says "there was this much total force".
 
Ah ok, guess that means my question can't be answered and an estimation is also not possible?
 
  • #10
freexd said:
Ah ok, guess that means my question can't be answered
Hard to say, without knowing the actual question.
 
  • #11
Seems like jbriggs understood my question.
 
  • #12
I understand that you are after a single number that reflects the strength of the jerk. What is less clear is exactly how that number would be defined, how it would be measured or how it would be useful.

It sounds very much like the kind of number that a show like "Sports Science" would use. Such shows specialize in coming up with single, precise and surprisingly large numbers that incompletely characterize complex actions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K