hemalpansuriya
- 22
- 7
Charge will experience a rotating magnetic field around it. What will be electric field ( If any ) at the centre, generated by rotation of magnet ?
The discussion centers on the interaction between a charge and a rotating magnetic field, specifically analyzing the electric field generated at the center of rotation. When a charge \( q \) is placed at the center of a rotating magnet with angular frequency \( \omega \), the magnetic field is expressed as \( \vec{B} = B_0(\cos\omega t\hat{x} + \sin\omega t\hat{y}) \). The electric field \( \vec{E} \) at the center is determined using Maxwell's equation \( \nabla \times \vec{E} = -\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt} \), leading to the conclusion that \( E_x = E_y = 0 \) and \( E_z = 0 \) at the center, resulting in no net force on the charge.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in the dynamics of charged particles in rotating magnetic fields.
what are your thoughts? Which of Maxwell's equations probably applies here? Also, is this question for schoolwork?hemalpansuriya said:Summary:: A magnet is rotating in a circle facing its one of the pole towards the centre with radius R. If we put a charge q at the centre, what will be force on charge?
Charge will experience a rotating magnetic field around it. What will be electric field ( If any ) at the centre, generated by rotation of magnet ?
We can apply equation, curl E = -dB/dt to find electric field generated at the centre due to rotating magnet facing its one of pole at the centre. The question is not for homework, its my personal curiosity.berkeman said:what are your thoughts? Which of Maxwell's equations probably applies here? Also, is this question for schoolwork?
Sorry, but I deleted my post #4 as there's a mistake in it. I will post a correct solution - if it comes to me.hemalpansuriya said:Many thanks for your effort.

No, my mistake was to let ## (\nabla \times \bf E)_\theta = \partial E_r/\partial \theta - \partial E_\theta/\partial r = \omega B_0 ## or whatever I wrote.. Should have been obvious - the ##\theta## component of curl can't have any ##theta## in either derivative. Has to be ## \partial E_r/\partial z - \partial E_z/\partial r = \omega B_0 ##. But now I can't get a grip on the boundary values.Delta2 said:If ##\omega## is angular frequency of the rotation, then the rotating magnetic field at the center is given in cartesian components (if I am not mistaken) by $$\vec{B}=B_0(\cos\omega t\hat x+\sin\omega t\hat y)$$
Then we have to solve the PDE $$\nabla\times \vec{E}=-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}$$ which in fact is a system of three PDEs, because ##\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}## will have two components (x and y) and we ll also get one more equation by equating the z-component of curl to 0 (I am not sure if we need this last PDE). We will have three unknowns (##E_x,E_y,E_z##) and 3 PDEs.
EDIT: Don't know if @rude man did the same mistake as me, but I completely neglected the generation of additional B-field according to Maxwell-Ampere's law. Maybe if ##\omega## is small we can safely neglect it.
Please checkout solution that I have tried,Delta2 said:If ##\omega## is angular frequency of the rotation, then the rotating magnetic field at the center is given in cartesian components (if I am not mistaken) by $$\vec{B}=B_0(\cos\omega t\hat x+\sin\omega t\hat y)$$
Then we have to solve the PDE $$\nabla\times \vec{E}=-\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}$$ which in fact is a system of three PDEs, because ##\frac{d\vec{B}}{dt}## will have two components (x and y) and we ll also get one more equation by equating the z-component of curl to 0 (I am not sure if we need this last PDE). We will have three unknowns (##E_x,E_y,E_z##) and 3 PDEs.
EDIT: Don't know if @rude man did the same mistake as me, but I completely neglected the generation of additional B-field according to Maxwell-Ampere's law. Maybe if ##\omega## is small we can safely neglect it.
So, Ez is zero at the contre ( because x and y = 0 ). Right ?Delta2 said:After a bit more thought I end up that $$E_x=E_y=0, E_z=yB_0\omega\sin{\omega t}+xB_0\omega\cos{\omega t}$$ is one possible solution, I think it satisfies the original curl equation.
Yes.hemalpansuriya said:So, Ez is zero at the contre ( because x and y = 0 ). Right ?
Ok. Thank youDelta2 said:Yes.