Force on a point from electric charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the net force on a point charge due to other electric charges, specifically focusing on the force components in the x and y directions. The subject area includes electrostatics and Coulomb's law.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the separation of forces into x and y components, questioning the distances used in calculations. Some express confusion about the application of Coulomb's law and the correct interpretation of angles in force calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively sharing their calculations and questioning each other's approaches. Some have provided detailed workings, while others are seeking clarification on specific steps and assumptions. There is a recognition of potential errors in the application of formulas and values.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the distances used for the charges and the correct application of Coulomb's law. Participants are also discussing the implications of charge interactions and the directions of force components.

rocapp
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



knight_Figure_25_46.jpg

What is the net force on the bottom charge?
Please give the force in Fx and Fy

Homework Equations



F=qE
E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Fx=2.88x10^-9N
Fy=-1.01x10^-4N

These aren't correct. I used the equation above and used

r=0.035m for both the side charges.

For the top charge,

r=0.05m

Why is the formula not working?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rocapp said:

Homework Statement



knight_Figure_25_46.jpg

What is the net force on the bottom charge?
Please give the force in Fx and Fy

Homework Equations



F=qE
E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Fx=2.88x10^-9N
Fy=-1.01x10^-4N

These aren't correct. I used the equation above and used

r=0.035m for both the side charges.

For the top charge,

r=0.05m

Why is the formula not working?

Thanks!

Why do you use r=3.5 cm for the side charges when r=5 cm is indicated?

ehild
 
I have to separate the forces into their x and y components, so the distance on the x-axis should be 3.5 cm. is this not the right approach?
 
How do you use the distance on the x-axis at all? Show your working in detail.

ehild
 
hi rocapp! :smile:
rocapp said:
I have to separate the forces into their x and y components, so the distance on the x-axis should be 3.5 cm. is this not the right approach?

nooo :redface:

you want Q/r2 times cosθ,

but you're using Q/(rcosθ)2 :wink:
 
Ohh! Thanks so much!
 
Does the 1nC charge affect itself in terms of force?

I keep getting wrong answers still.

-2.124×10^-23 N is the y-component I get from the -6nC charge.
1.00x10^-23 N is the y-component I get from both 2 nC charges on the 1 nC charge.
Fy = -1.124x10^-24 N

But that's not correct.

Fx=1.00x10^-23 N

Not sure if either of these are correct.
 
Last edited:
How did you get these data? Show your work in detail, please.

ehild
 
In the images attached are the exact equations I used for Fx and Fy.
 

Attachments

  • MSP83711ih34f3iiibf50dd0000307bi435h486g033.gif
    MSP83711ih34f3iiibf50dd0000307bi435h486g033.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 536
  • MSP50951a9a2ef6392c2hda00002fa3dge1i579dcc5.gif
    MSP50951a9a2ef6392c2hda00002fa3dge1i579dcc5.gif
    1.3 KB · Views: 512
  • #10
You use wrong value for k in Coulomb's Law.

You need the resultant force on the bottom charge. Fx should be the horizontal component of the resultant force, Fy has to be the vertical component. What are the directions of the force components exerted bas the charges?

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Ah. Thanks for that!

The horizontal x component of the -6 nC charge is zero because it is directly above the 1 nC charge.

The horizontal x component of one of the 2 nC charges is:

Fx = (k*q*q/r^2)*cos(theta)
Fx = ((8.99x10^9)*(2x10^-9)*(1.0x10^-9)/(.05^2))*cos(45)
Fx = 5.09x10^-6 N

Since there are two, the total Fx = 2*5.09x10^-6 N = 1.02x10^-5 N

The y-components of the two 2 nC charges are the same as the x components because sin(45)=cos(45).

The y-component of the -6 nC charge is

Fy=((8.99x10^9)*(1.0x10^-9)*(-6x10^-9)/(0.05^2))
Fy= -2.16x10^-5 N

So the total Fy= Fy + Fy = (-2.16x10^-9) + (1.02x10^-5) = 1.02x10^-5 N

This is still not correct, though.
 
  • #12
rocapp said:
The horizontal x component of the -6 nC charge is zero because it is directly above the 1 nC charge.

The horizontal x component of one of the 2 nC charges is:

Fx = (k*q*q/r^2)*cos(theta)
Fx = ((8.99x10^9)*(2x10^-9)*(1.0x10^-9)/(.05^2))*cos(45)
Fx = 5.09x10^-6 N

Since there are two, the total Fx = 2*5.09x10^-6 N = 1.02x10^-5 N

Check the direction of these forces. Are not the x components opposite to each other?

rocapp said:
The y-components of the two 2 nC charges are the same as the x components because sin(45)=cos(45).

The y-component of the -6 nC charge is

Fy=((8.99x10^9)*(1.0x10^-9)*(-6x10^-9)/(0.05^2))
Fy= -2.16x10^-5 N

Show what you mean on positive y direction, up of down?

rocapp said:
So the total Fy= Fy + Fy = (-2.16x10^-9) + (1.02x10^-5) = 1.02x10^-5 N

This is still not correct, though.

Do not note the different force components with the same Fy. And you made a mistake, it is not 2.16x10^-9 but 2.16x10^-5.

ehild
 
  • #13
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
8K