Force to apply to a loop moving away from a current-carrying wire

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the force required to move a loop away from a current-carrying wire, utilizing the principles of electromagnetism. The derived expressions for induced electromotive force (EMF) and applied force are presented, with the final force expression being ##F=\frac{\mu_0^2i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2Rh(h+l)(h+vt)(h+l+vt)}##. Participants clarify that the variable ##h## should not be treated as constant, emphasizing the importance of correctly defining variables in the context of time-dependent motion. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the correct formulation of the force based on the instantaneous distance from the wire.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic induction principles
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart Law
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly differentiation
  • Basic concepts of magnetic fields and forces on current-carrying conductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Biot-Savart Law for magnetic fields
  • Learn about Lenz's Law and its application in induced EMF calculations
  • Explore the concept of variable distance in electromagnetism
  • Investigate the effects of changing magnetic fields on induced currents
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the applications of electromagnetism in dynamic systems.

lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
A square loop of wire with ##N## turns, side of length ##l## and resistance ##R## is initially at distance ##h## to the right of an infinitely long wire carrying a steady current ##i##.
(1) Find the induced current if the loop starts moving away from the wire at constant speed ##v##.
(2) Find the force you would have to apply to the loop so that it continues moving at this constant speed ##v##.
Relevant Equations
##\mathcal{E}=-\frac{d\Phi(\vec{B})}{dt},\ \vec{F}=i\vec{l}\times\vec{B}##
What I have done:

(1) ##\Phi(\vec{B})=\int_{S}\vec{B}\cdot d\vec{S}=-\frac{N\mu_0 il}{2\pi}\int_{s=h}^{s=h+l}\frac{ds}{s}=-\frac{\mu_0iNl}{2\pi}\ln(\frac{h+l}{h})##
so ##\mathcal{E}=-\frac{d\phi(\vec{B})}{dt}=-\frac{\mu_0iNl^2v}{2\pi h(h+l)}## so ##i_{ind}=\frac{\mathcal{E}}{R}=-\frac{\mu_0il^2Nv}{2\pi Rh(h+l)}.##

(2) The force one the left side of the square has greater magnitude than that on the right side (since ##i## and ##l## are the same for both sides but ##B_{left}=\frac{\mu_0 i}{2\pi s}>B_{right}=\frac{\mu_0 i}{2\pi (s+l)}##) so the net force on the loop is to the left, hence, to make the loop move away at constant speed ##v## I should apply a force to the right which is equal in magnitude to the net force on the loop due to the magnetic field: ##F_{applied}=F_{right}-F_{left}=i_{ind}l(B_{right}-B_{left})=-\frac{\mu_0il^2Nv}{2\pi Rh(h+l)}l\frac{\mu_0i}{2\pi}(\frac{1}{h+l+vt}-\frac{1}{h+vt})=\frac{\mu_0^2 i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2 Rh(h+l)(h+l+vt)(h+vt)}##, where the last two equalities follow from the fact that, if the loop starts moving to the right at constant speed ##v## at time ##t=0##, at time ##t## the left side is at distance ##h+vt## from the wire and the right side at distance ##h+vt+l##.

Now, my analysis does make sense to me since, intuitively, as the loop is moving away from the wire the magnetic field gets increasingly weaker so the force to be applied to make it move at constant speed ##v## should get weaker too, but the book I got this problem from says that the force applied should be ##F=\frac{\mu_0^2i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2Rh^2(h+l)^2}##.
Why is the force constant? This result agrees with mine at ##t=0## so is it possible that maybe the text is asking for the force to be applied just as the loop starts moving to the right? Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
lorenz0 said:
so ##\mathcal{E}=-\frac{d\phi(\vec{B})}{dt}=-\frac{\mu_0iNl^2v}{2\pi h(h+l)}##
After you take the derivative, ##h## is a variable that denotes the instantaneous distance to the wire and ##v## is its (constant) rate of change, ##v=\frac{dh}{dt}##. So when you write ##F=\frac{\mu_0^2i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2Rh^2(h+l)^2}##, you cannot treat ##h## as a constant. It would have been clearer to use another variable ##y## as the distance to the wire and write the force as
##F=\frac{\mu_0^2i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2Ry^2(y+l)^2}## then replace ##y=h+vt## in the expression.

By the way, I did not check your force expression for correctness.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lorenz0
kuruman said:
After you take the derivative, ##h## is a variable that denotes the instantaneous distance to the wire and ##v## is its (constant) rate of change, ##v=\frac{dh}{dt}##. So when you write ##F=\frac{\mu_0^2i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2Rh^2(h+l)^2}##, you cannot treat ##h## as a constant. It would have been clearer to use another variable ##y## as the distance to the wire and write the force as
##F=\frac{\mu_0^2i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2Ry^2(y+l)^2}## then replace ##y=h+vt## in the expression.

By the way, I did not check your force expression for correctness.
I see, thanks. So, if I understand correctly, if I treated ##h## as a constant (representing the initial loop-wire distance at ##t=0##), ##F=\frac{\mu_0^2i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2Rh(h+l)(h+vt)(h+l+vt)}## would be a correct formulation for the force to be applied at time ##t##, right?
 
I check your old expression and it is correct. Your new expression looks incorrect. If you had followed my suggestion
kuruman said:
Write the force as
##F=\frac{\mu_0^2i^2l^4Nv}{(2\pi)^2Ry^2(y+l)^2}## then replace ##y=h+vt## in the expression.
you would have gotten the correct expression.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lorenz0
kuruman said:
I check your old expression and it is correct. Your new expression looks incorrect. If you had followed my suggestion

you would have gotten the correct expression.
I see, thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
552
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
907
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K