Force with friction problem, Please help

  • Thread starter Thread starter AntonioMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Friction
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks connected by a string over a pulley, where Block A (3kg) is on a horizontal surface and Block B (1kg) is on an incline. The user believes that the applied force of 2.3 N is insufficient to overcome the kinetic friction acting on Block A, leading to a negative acceleration calculation of -0.37 N/4 kg. Classmates argue for a positive acceleration, which the user finds confusing given the friction forces calculated. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying forces and mass assignments in solving such problems, suggesting that mislabeling could lead to misunderstandings. The user seeks confirmation of their calculations and understanding of the situation.
AntonioMD
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, perhaps you can help me here. I'm having an argument with my classmates on this problem and I'm 99% certain I'm correct. Please provide any feedback.

Homework Statement



Block A is 3kg and is sitting on a horizontal surface, it is attached to a string of negligible mass to block B of 1kg, which is sitting on an inclined plane of 30 degrees to the right of Block A, over a pulley of negligible mass. Block A has a force of 2.3 N being applied to it in the positive direction of x. Both blocks have a coefficient of kinetic friction of .20, Solve for the acceleration of the system and the tension in the string.

Homework Equations



m1 = 3Kg
m2=1kg
coef. of kinetic friction: .20
Fap= 2.3N

Force of kinetic friction=Fn x Coefficient

The Attempt at a Solution

Applying Newtons second law to mass 1

T+Fapplied- force of kinetic friction=m1a

Applying Newtons second law to mass 2

m2gsin∅-T-force of kinetic friction on block 2= m2a
I solve for tension on both equations and then combine them to solve for acceleration:

T=m1a-Fapplied+Fk1

T=m2gsin∅-Fk2-m2a

a=(m2gsin∅-Fk2-Fk1+Fapplied)/(m1+m2)

This yields -.37N/4Kg

My fellow students claim that they're obtaining a positive acceleration but I don't understand how that's even possible.

You have a 3kg Block A with a kinetic friction of 3kg*9.8m/s^2 = 29.4N x .20 = 5.88N and an applied force of only 2.3N, meaning you're going to need a force greater than 3.58 N to keep Block A moving.

Block b has a kinetic friction of 1kg*9.8cos∅ = 8.5N x .20 = 1.7N and the only force acting on block B is gravity, with magniture m2gsin∅ = 1kg*9.8sin∅ = 4.5 N, so the net force acting on the block is only 2.8N. Does this not mean that it is impossible for block A to move along the positive direction of X? My acceleration is yielding negative because the kinetic friction force is greater than the net forces acting in the positive direction of X.

Can someone please confirm that I am correct or please explain to me why I am wrong. It would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AntonioMD said:
Hey everyone, perhaps you can help me here. I'm having an argument with my classmates on this problem and I'm 99% certain I'm correct. Please provide any feedback.

Homework Statement



Block A is 3kg and is sitting on a horizontal surface, it is attached to a string of negligible mass to block B of 1kg, which is sitting on an inclined plane of 30 degrees to the right of Block A, over a pulley of negligible mass. Block A has a force of 2.3 N being applied to it in the positive direction of x. Both blocks have a coefficient of kinetic friction of .20, Solve for the acceleration of the system and the tension in the string.

Homework Equations



m1 = 3Kg
m2=1kg
coef. of kinetic friction: .20
Fap= 2.3N

Force of kinetic friction=Fn x Coefficient

The Attempt at a Solution

Applying Newtons second law to mass 1

T+Fapplied- force of kinetic friction=m1a

Applying Newtons second law to mass 2

m2gsin∅-T-force of kinetic friction on block 2= m2a
I solve for tension on both equations and then combine them to solve for acceleration:

T=m1a-Fapplied+Fk1

T=m2gsin∅-Fk2-m2a

a=(m2gsin∅-Fk2-Fk1+Fapplied)/(m1+m2)

This yields -.37N/4Kg

My fellow students claim that they're obtaining a positive acceleration but I don't understand how that's even possible.

You have a 3kg Block A with a kinetic friction of 3kg*9.8m/s^2 = 29.4N x .20 = 5.88N and an applied force of only 2.3N, meaning you're going to need a force greater than 3.58 N to keep Block A moving.

Block b has a kinetic friction of 1kg*9.8cos∅ = 8.5N x .20 = 1.7N and the only force acting on block B is gravity, with magniture m2gsin∅ = 1kg*9.8sin∅ = 4.5 N, so the net force acting on the block is only 2.8N. Does this not mean that it is impossible for block A to move along the positive direction of X? My acceleration is yielding negative because the kinetic friction force is greater than the net forces acting in the positive direction of X.

Can someone please confirm that I am correct or please explain to me why I am wrong. It would be greatly appreciated!

IF the acceleration was negative, the friction forces would be in the opposite direction!

Perhaps these masses don't go in either direction?
 
Last edited:
Double check that you have the problem statement completely correct. Was a diagram included?
 
There was a diagram included but the problem is exactly as stated. I've attached an image of the problem.
 

Attachments

  • PROBLEM.jpg
    PROBLEM.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 458
Double check that you haven't reversed m1 and m2.
 
AntonioMD said:
There was a diagram included but the problem is exactly as stated. I've attached an image of the problem.

Just a hint when solving this sort of problem ...

Instead of randomly assigning m1 and m2 to the masses, call the 1 kg mass m1 and the 3 kg mass m3. That way you are never in doubt about which mass you are dealing with.
And yes, I do have problems that include three masses m5, m7 and m12.

Note: I am not saying you have got the masses back to front here!
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K