Forces acting on two blocks stacked one on another

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two blocks, where one block (m1) is stacked on top of another block (m2), which is on a frictionless surface. The problem explores the forces acting on both blocks when a horizontal force is applied to m1, and it involves concepts of kinetic friction and normal forces.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of normal forces for both blocks and the implications of friction between them. There are questions about the forces acting on block m2 in the x-axis and whether the logic applied to the forces in the y-axis is correct.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the free body diagrams (FBDs) for both blocks, noting the forces acting on each block. There is ongoing exploration of the relationship between the forces and accelerations of the two blocks, with some participants questioning their understanding of the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of the static friction coefficient and the relative masses of the blocks, which may influence the dynamics of the system. There is also mention of potential confusion due to the subscripts used in the equations.

Siracuse
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'll describe this without the numbers, values and such. The issue here is to understand the logic worked on this problem...well any problem is like that. Anyhow, this is the situation:

A block of mass m1 is stacked on the surface of another block of mass m2 of width L, where m2>>m1. There is kinetic friction between those two blocks, static friction coefficient is not given. Block m2 is on a frictionless surface. An horizontal, constant force F is applied on block m1. The whole system of blocks moves.

Homework Equations



Sum of forces in x,y components;

The Attempt at a Solution



First thing: since there is a friction force, calculating the normal force in this case is important. For block m1,

Fn_m1 - Fg_m1 + Fn_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m1 = Fg_m1 - F_m2;

For block m2,

Fn_m2 - Fg_m1 - Fg_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m2 = Fg_m1 + Fg_m2;

The rest should just involve basic algebra, to obtain Fn_m1 and, therefore, the value of the kinetic friction force.

Now, to work on the second part, the x-axis. Block m1:

F - F_kin = m.a

For block m2...here's where I think I don't know what I am doing. The picture of my Halliday book shows block m2 moving, so what kind of forces are acting on m2 in the x-axis? Is there a resulting force derived from the friction between the blocks? I've thought about this for a while and I'm just clueless. Not even sure if my logic for the forces on the y-axis is correct...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Siracuse said:

Homework Statement


I'll describe this without the numbers, values and such. The issue here is to understand the logic worked on this problem...well any problem is like that. Anyhow, this is the situation:

A block of mass m1 is stacked on the surface of another block of mass m2 of width L, where m2>>m1. There is kinetic friction between those two blocks, static friction coefficient is not given. Block m2 is on a frictionless surface. An horizontal, constant force F is applied on block m1. The whole system of blocks moves.


Homework Equations



Sum of forces in x,y components;

The Attempt at a Solution



First thing: since there is a friction force, calculating the normal force in this case is important. For block m1,

Fn_m1 - Fg_m1 + Fn_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m1 = Fg_m1 - F_m2;
no, when you look at the forces acting on m1 inthe vertical direction, using a free body diagram, there are 2 forces acting: its weight down, and the normal force of m2 on m1, acting up. You've got an extra term in there.

For block m2,

Fn_m2 - Fg_m1 - Fg_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m2 = Fg_m1 + Fg_m2;
this is actually based on a FBD of both blocks together, and gives the correct value of Fn_m2

The rest should just involve basic algebra, to obtain Fn_m1 and, therefore, the value of the kinetic friction force.
yes, using the correct value for Fn_m1

Now, to work on the second part, the x-axis. Block m1:

F - F_kin = m.a
yes, correct

For block m2...here's where I think I don't know what I am doing. The picture of my Halliday book shows block m2 moving, so what kind of forces are acting on m2 in the x-axis? Is there a resulting force derived from the friction between the blocks? I've thought about this for a while and I'm just clueless. Not even sure if my logic for the forces on the y-axis is correct...
Yes, draw a FBD of block 2. What force acts on m2 in the x direction (HINT: use your results from the FBD of block m1, and Newton 3).
 
PhanthomJay said:
no, when you look at the forces acting on m1 inthe vertical direction, using a free body diagram, there are 2 forces acting: its weight down, and the normal force of m2 on m1, acting up. You've got an extra term in there.

this is actually based on a FBD of both blocks together, and gives the correct value of Fn_m2

yes, using the correct value for Fn_m1

yes, correct

Yes, draw a FBD of block 2. What force acts on m2 in the x direction (HINT: use your results from the FBD of block m1, and Newton 3).

Okay, for m1 in y-axis, it'd be: Fn_m2 = Fg_m1, since the only normal force here is coming from the other block.
As for m2, I don't really see why the forces drawn in a FBD for m2 for it don't match for my equation. There is the weight force from m1, and from m2 acting on it downwards and the normal force from the surface.

For m2's forces in the x-axis, after some thinking, this is what I came up with: the friction force in m1 is a reaction against a force applied in m2. Therefore, for block m2,

F_d = m.a, where F_d = F_kin in absolute values. Force F can't be drawn here, it was applied on block m1 only.
 
Siracuse said:
Okay, for m1 in y-axis, it'd be: Fn_m2 = Fg_m1, since the only normal force here is coming from the other block.
Okay there's a lot of subscripts here that lead to confusion, suffice to say that the normal force of m2 on m1 acts upward on m1 and is equal to the weight of blocK m1.
As for m2, I don't really see why the forces drawn in a FBD for m2 for it don't match for my equation. There is the weight force from m1, and from m2 acting on it downwards and the normal force from the surface.
when you draw a FBD of m2, there are 3 forces acting on m2 in the vertical direction: The weight force of m2, the normal force upward from the surface, and the normal force downward from m1 on m2. The weight of m1 does not enter into the FBD of m2, although it happens in this problem to be the same as the normal force acting downward from m1 on m2.

For m2's forces in the x-axis, after some thinking, this is what I came up with: the friction force in m1 is a reaction against a force applied in m2. Therefore, for block m2,

F_d = m.a, where F_d = F_kin in absolute values. Force F can't be drawn here, it was applied on block m1 only.
yes, correct, but be sure in your FBD of m2 that your equation reads F_kin = m2a2, and note that a2 is not the same as a1, I'm not sure if this is clear to you, is it?
 
PhanthomJay said:
Okay there's a lot of subscripts here that lead to confusion, suffice to say that the normal force of m2 on m1 acts upward on m1 and is equal to the weight of blocK m1.
when you draw a FBD of m2, there are 3 forces acting on m2 in the vertical direction: The weight force of m2, the normal force upward from the surface, and the normal force downward from m1 on m2. The weight of m1 does not enter into the FBD of m2, although it happens in this problem to be the same as the normal force acting downward from m1 on m2.

yes, correct, but be sure in your FBD of m2 that your equation reads F_kin = m2a2, and note that a2 is not the same as a1, I'm not sure if this is clear to you, is it?

Alright got it. As for the last line, I can understand that a2 << a1, because, in this case m1<<m2, and F (force applied on m1) >> F_kin. A force of small magnitude on a block of great mass accelerates the block at a much slower rate than a block of small mass pushed by a force of great magnitude.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K