Forces involved in principle of virtual work

AI Thread Summary
The principle of virtual work indicates that a system can remain in equilibrium if the total virtual work done by weights is zero, allowing for deformation into a parallelogram. However, this assumes that reaction forces at the joints do not contribute to the work done, raising questions about the validity of this assumption. The discussion emphasizes that forces at the joints are internal and consist of action-reaction pairs between bars. Acknowledging these internal forces is crucial for a complete understanding of the system's dynamics. Overall, the equilibrium condition relies heavily on the treatment of internal forces within the system.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
See picture below
Relevant Equations
Work done = Fd
Screenshot 2024-05-28 at 12.46.18 AM.png

The answer is as such: There’s only one way for the system to move: the rectangle can deform into a parallelogramso that the left horizontal arm moves up, and the right horizontal arm moves down by thesame amount. Then the total virtual work done on the scale by the weights is zero, so thesystem can be in equilibrium no matter where on the arms the weights are placed.

While I can understand this, this assumes that there is 0 work done by reaction forces at the joints, so the net work done on the system is entirely due to gravity. How fair is this assumption?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The forces in the joints are internal forces of the system. At a joint where two bars meet, the forces that the two bars exert on each other are action-reaction forces.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
TSny said:
The forces in the joints are internal forces of the system. At a joint where two bars meet, the forces that the two bars exert on each other are action-reaction forces.
Oh right, forgot about that! Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top