Forces problem: a donkey pulling a cart

  • Thread starter Thread starter N_L_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cart Forces
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a 255 kg donkey pulling a 520 kg cart with a force of 1940 N while moving at a constant velocity of 0.72 m/s. The coefficient of kinetic friction calculated for the cart's wheels is 0.381, and the normal force exerted on the donkey is 2499 N. When the cart accelerates at 0.24 m/s², the applied force by the donkey increases to 2000.42 N, with a friction coefficient of 0.776. The conversation highlights the complexities of Newton's laws, particularly the distinction between the forces exerted by the donkey and the cart.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Laws of Motion
  • Knowledge of forces, mass, and acceleration calculations
  • Familiarity with the concept of friction and coefficients of friction
  • Basic principles of dynamics and kinematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's Second Law in dynamic systems
  • Explore the concept of friction in various materials and surfaces
  • Learn about the conservation of momentum and its implications in physics
  • Investigate real-world applications of forces in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the application of Newton's laws in real-world scenarios, particularly in mechanics and dynamics.

N_L_
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I worked out the following problem, but I am unsure of my answers. Do they look correct?


Part A

A 255 kg donkey is pulling on a cart with a horizontal force of 1940 N. The mass of the cart is 520 kg and the cart is rolling at a constant velocity of 0.72 meters / second to the left. Find:

a) The coefficient of kinetic friction for the wheel's bearings on the cart.
b) The force exerted on the donkey by the surface.

What I have:

constant velocity = zero acceleration

The sum of the forces on the in the X direction = Fapp - Ffr = 0

1940 N - Mu (9.8 * 520) = 0

Mu for the cart = .381

The force exerted on the donkey by the surface = Fnormal. Fn = m*g = 2499 N


Part B

The same donkey is pulling on the same cart, but now the cart is accelerating at 0.24 m/s^2 to the left. Find:


a) The force by the donkey on the cart

b) The force by the surface on the donkey


The sum of the forces in the X direction = Fapp - Ffr = 255 * 0.24

Fapp - (Mu)(9.8)(255) = 61.2


From the previous part of the problem, Mu = .776

Fapp = 2000.42 N

Fn = 9.8 * 255 = 2499 N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A)
The first part looks good, but in b the surface exerts force on the donkey on the X axis to. If it didn't then the donkey would just tread in place without being able to move.
B)
You wrote: Fapp - Ffr = 255 * 0.24 , but you're looking at the forces on the cart. Whose mass are you using?
 
Thank you for your help.
 
This is an ancient problem that I first read as a teenager in the 50s in "The World of Mathematics" by Newman. It is not an ordinary physics problem involving friction, etc. The conundrum, properly stated, is that the force the the donkey exerts on the cart is equal and opposite to the force that the cart exerts on the donkey. These forces add to zero according the the Third Law, so how can the donkey pull the cart? At parties in grad school in the 60s, not one physics professor was able to answer this problem correctly in terms of Newton's Laws. The problem is the indirection of referring to the 3rd law. It is the 2nd law that controls the motion of the cart. The motion of a body is controlled by all the forces exerted on *it*, not the forces it exerts on other bodies. When I was a professor, not one student ever got this problem completely right even though they were asked it on every quiz, and tutored in section. All I had to do was replace the donkey pulling a cart with a bee landing on a flower, or a pitcher throwing a ball to completely confuse them, because they didn't understand Newton's laws. Few do. Almost all of us are Artistotelians in daily life. The fact that the reciprocal forces add to zero is of course just a restatement of the law of conservation of momentum.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K