Formalisms (in fidelity calculation for quantum teleportation)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the fidelity of mixed channels in quantum teleportation, specifically using the formula F := < Φ^{(-)}_{12} | ρ_{1} ⊗ ρ_{23} | Φ^{(-)}_{12} >. The states involved include ρ_{1} = | φ_{1} >< φ_{1} | and ρ_{23} = t | Φ^{(+)}_{23}><Φ^{(+)}_{23}| + (1-t) | Φ^{(-)}_{23}><Φ^{(-)}_{23}|. The participant inquires about the relevance of terms like < 0_{1} | 1_{3} >, which are confirmed to be valid but yield a value of zero due to orthogonality, allowing them to be ignored in the calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum states and notation, specifically | φ > and | Φ >.
  • Familiarity with fidelity calculations in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of mixed states and their representation in quantum teleportation.
  • Basic grasp of orthogonality in quantum states.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of fidelity in quantum teleportation.
  • Explore the implications of mixed states in quantum information theory.
  • Learn about the role of orthogonality in quantum state comparisons.
  • Investigate advanced quantum teleportation protocols and their fidelity calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in quantum information science, and students studying quantum mechanics and teleportation protocols.

ssampak
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am trying to read a paper about quantum teleportation and got stuck with calculating the fidelity of the mixed(noisy) channel.

Fidelity F := < [tex]\Phi^{(-)}_{12} | \rho_{1} \otimes \rho_{23} | \Phi^{(-)}_{12}[/tex] >

where [tex]\rho_{1} = | \phi_{1} > < \phi_{1} |[/tex]
and [tex]\rho_{23} = t | \Phi^{(+)}_{23}><\Phi^{(+)}_{23}| + (1-t) | \Phi^{(-)}_{23}><\Phi^{(-)}_{23}|[/tex]

[tex]|\phi_{1}> = a|0_{1}> + b|1_{1}>[/tex]
[tex]|\Phi^{(\pm)}_{23}> = 1/sqrt{2} (|00_{23}> \pm |11_{23}>)[/tex]

Am I doing wrong if terms like < 0_{1} | 1_{3} > appear?
Then, if right what do I have to do with those? If wrong please give me the right way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you are not doing anything wrong. The terms < 0_{1} | 1_{3} > may appear in the calculation of the fidelity. In this case, since the two states being compared are orthogonal, the value of such a term will be zero, so you can simply ignore it and carry on with the calculation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K