Formulating Ripple Equation for 2D Symmetry

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sodaboy7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ripple
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on formulating a one-dimensional ripple equation, specifically in the form y(x) = Ae^{-bx}cos{x}, which satisfies conditions of symmetry about the y-axis and normalization of the square of the norm in infinity. The equation is intended to model water ripples while ensuring that the amplitude remains non-negative. Key considerations include defining the source function and initial displacement, as well as clarifying whether a one-dimensional or two-dimensional solution is desired.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations in physics
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and their applications
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their solutions
  • Basic concepts of mathematical modeling of physical phenomena
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of wave equations in polar coordinates
  • Explore the properties of exponential decay functions in modeling physical systems
  • Study the implications of symmetry in mathematical functions
  • Investigate the normalization of functions in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in modeling wave phenomena, particularly those interested in the mathematical formulation of ripple effects in fluid dynamics.

sodaboy7
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I want to formulate an approx 2D ripple equation μ(x,y). It should satisfy following:

1) it should have highest amplitude on y-axis at x=0. It should be symmetrical about y axis. It should fade away at some x on both positive and negetive x-axis symmetrically. Fading in a way of decreasing amplitude. It should not give negetive value of y.

2) most important. The square of norm of μ should be normalized in infinity.

I am not good at math but this is integral part of my project. It can be visualized as : consider x-axis as still surface of water and you drop a pebble on it. But it should be shifted upwards such that it should not fall in negetive y axis. Also it should be preferably in cartesian co ordinates
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean a "ripple" like function on a plane surface that models a water wave?
Your conditions are:
1.symmetric across the y-axis (simply solve in polar coordinates, with the condition that the function obeys ψ(r,θ)=ψ(r,θ+pi)
2.Falls off at infinity, that's fine we'll just pick a solution that does this

And then simply solve the wave equation in polar coordinates with these conditions.
Ta-da.

However, could you specify how you want it?
There are a few things you have to consider.
1.Source function?
2.Initial displacement?

Also, you cannot limit the function to be positive, that would be non-physical. Real water ripples go both ways.Edit: Now I'm a bit confused, do you want a plane solution or a one dimensional solution? I thought you meant the former, seeing as you referred to the function as a "ripple equation" and specified two arguments for it (mu(x,y)), but then I read your conditions again and you also imply you want a one dimensional one. (i.e. y(x))
 
Last edited:
HomogenousCow said:
Do you mean a "ripple" like function on a plane surface that models a water wave?
Your conditions are:
1.symmetric across the y-axis (simply solve in polar coordinates, with the condition that the function obeys ψ(r,θ)=ψ(r,θ+pi)
2.Falls off at infinity, that's fine we'll just pick a solution that does this

And then simply solve the wave equation in polar coordinates with these conditions.
Ta-da.

However, could you specify how you want it?
There are a few things you have to consider.
1.Source function?
2.Initial displacement?

Also, you cannot limit the function to be positive, that would be non-physical. Real water ripples go both ways.


Edit: Now I'm a bit confused, do you want a plane solution or a one dimensional solution? I thought you meant the former, seeing as you referred to the function as a "ripple equation" and specified two arguments for it (mu(x,y)), but then I read your conditions again and you also imply you want a one dimensional one. (i.e. y(x))

I did a silly mistake there, I want 1D solution of it. :-P
 
I want it in form y(x)
 
y(x) = Ae^{-bx}\cos{x} fits the bill. What exactly are you trying to model? You're better off deriving a differential equation and trying to solve it than just picking out a function from random that meets certain requirements.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
727
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K