Forum Rules: Understand Why Questions Are Closed on Physics Forums

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avichal
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Questions on Physics Forums are often closed when they require speculation rather than adherence to established scientific principles. The recent closure of a question about the Earth's atmospheric thickness and its effects on temperature and life forms exemplifies this issue. While the inquiry touches on relevant Earth sciences, it veers into speculative territory by asking how life would differ under hypothetical conditions. To align with forum guidelines, questions should focus on concrete scientific knowledge without inviting guesses about unknown variables. The forum prioritizes discussions grounded in established science over speculative scenarios.
Avichal
Messages
294
Reaction score
0
I'm a bit confused regarding questions which are not allowed here on PF.

There is this recent question that was closed - https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=4508302#post4508302

It asked if the Earth atmosphere's thickness differed, then how will it affect temperature, weather and life forms?
I don't understand why is this closed. It requires knowledge of how atmosphere affects Earth and more of Earth sciences.

Similar questions in which you change one aspect and question how would it affect the surroundings, are sometimes closed. Why is this? I don't think this is speculation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The OP was asking people to speculate on how life on Earth would be different, how humans would be different. This leaves our criteria of sticking to known science and just making guesses. That is not the point of our science forums.

If the OP were to change it to exclude making guesses about things we can't know like how we would be different, and focus on actual Earth sciences, then it could be acceptable.
 
Last edited:
Evo said:
The OP was asking people to speculate on how life on Earth would be different, how humans would be different. This leaves our criteria of sticking to known science and just making guesses. That is not the point of our science forums.

If the OP were to change it to exclude making guesses about things we can't know like how we would be different, then it could be acceptable.

But the guesses will not be mere guesses, right? It will be based on known science of course.
Figuring out how humans would be different is somewhat tough and there will be no acceptable answer but are the forums rules so strict?
 
Over the years we have learned that those most qualified to speculate, do not. Speculations are loved by those with little or no knowledge so this type of thread really has little to offer.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top