Four L-shaped members: Mechanical Analysis Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter jojosg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around a mechanical analysis problem involving four L-shaped members. Participants are attempting to determine the support reactions at points A and B, utilizing principles of static equilibrium and moment calculations. The context includes equations of equilibrium, force balance, and moment balance for rigid bodies in a planar problem.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to calculate moments about point A but expresses uncertainty about their correctness.
  • Another suggests writing down the equations of equilibrium for each L-shaped member, noting the match between the number of equations and unknowns.
  • Several participants question the multiplication of certain forces by distances, particularly regarding the distances from point A.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of the perpendicular distance from the pivot to the force, with some participants asserting that certain distances are zero.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to clarify the system being analyzed, suggesting that internal forces should be ignored in certain calculations.
  • Another participant provides detailed equations for members BE and BC, including force balances and moment calculations, while also expressing confusion over the notation used by others.
  • There are corrections and refinements to earlier claims, particularly regarding the assumptions made about forces and their directions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views on how to approach the problem, the validity of certain assumptions, and the correct application of equilibrium equations. The discussion remains unresolved with ongoing debates about the calculations and interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of clearly defining forces and their points of application, as well as the need to distinguish between internal and external forces in the analysis. There are also mentions of potential confusion arising from the notation used in the equations.

  • #31
jojosg said:
I used basic trigo and drew a triangle with adjacent and opposite sides both a to get 45 degrees
Note that this is only justified because section DG is in equlibrium with only 2 forces acting on it.
So:
a) the 2 forces must have equal magnitudes and opposite directions;
b) the 2 forces must have a common line-of-action (dashed line, below).so that these forces have zero net moment.
1767621452502.webp


Edit: attempted simplifications/improvements.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jojosg

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K