Fourier series expansion problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Fourier series expansion of the piecewise function defined as f(x)=0 for -π PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of Fourier series and their coefficients
  • Knowledge of piecewise functions
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities
  • Ability to perform integration for Fourier coefficient calculation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Fourier coefficients for piecewise functions
  • Learn about convergence of Fourier series
  • Explore the implications of choosing specific values of x in Fourier series
  • Investigate the relationship between Fourier series and series convergence tests
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying Fourier analysis or signal processing will benefit from this discussion.

bbq pizza
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical forums, so no HH Template is shown >[/color]

hi I've got a problem that I've partially worked but don't understand the next part/have made a mistake?

f(x)=0 for -π<x<0 and f(x)=x for 0≤x≤π
i got a0=π/4 and an=0 and bn=0 if n is even and 2/n if n is odd

so... f(x)= π/4 + ∑ (2/(2n+1)) * sin(2n+1) * π * x
n=0
now i need to show π/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 ... using suitable values of x
how would i go about doing this?
any help is much appreciated
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello bbq, welcome to PF :smile: !

Can you show how you found these Fourier coefficients ?

Your choices for x are pretty limited, right ? If you try ##x=\pi## (not the right answer I suppose) what does the series give you ?
 
http://imageshack.com/a/img911/5796/jhLmo0.jpg
http://imageshack.com/a/img673/1972/xQeDHn.jpg
x=pi gives too high so i must have made a mistake on calculation of ceoffiscients but i don't see it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow. So you write it as a cosine series ? No sines ? Wouldn't that (##b_n = 0## the coefficents for sin nx for all n) give an even function as a result ?

[edit] oh, wait, the picture continues further down. Need some time to decrypt...


And $$a_n \equiv {1\over 2\pi} \int_0^\pi x\cos (nx)\; dx\quad {\rm ?} $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bbq pizza
I can see ##a_n = 0## for n = even. What if n is odd ?
 
f(x)= π/4 + ∑ (2/(2n+1)) * sin ( (2n+1) * π * x )
could that be f(x)= π/4 + 1/(2π) ∑ (2π/(2n+1)) * sin((2n+1) * x) ? And then you choose x = π/2 to get the (-1)n ?

(a choice that gets rid of the cosines too ! )

Modulo further errors on my part ...
 
thanks BvU.
I looked over it and noticed some mistakes, so.. an=( (-1)^n -1) / (π * n^2)
and bn= - ( (-1)^n ) / n
i see the π/2 getting rid of cosine but how do i achieve the π/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 ... using suitable values of x.
do i set x=π/4 then get 1 for ??
 
You're real close now !
But I suspect the (-1)n-1 and (-1)n is wishful thinking ? Could you explain ?

On the one hand you have ##f(x) = x##
On the other you have ##f(x) = π/4 + ...\Sigma ... \cos((2n+1)x)\ + \ ... \sin ((2n+1)x)##
Now make sure you have the right multipliers and coefficients
and pick an x that let's the cosines disappear and the sines be (-1)n
 
i got π/4 + ( ( -1)n-1 ) cos(nx) ) /π*n2+( (-1)nsin(nx) ) /n
with the an=(-1)n-1) / (πn2) because during the an calculation i get an=( cos(nπ)-cos(n0) ) / (πn2) and cos1π=-1 and cos(0)=cos2π=1 so -1n=+1 for n=even and =-1 for n=odd
and bn= - ( (-1)n ) / n from ( -nπcos(nπ) )/πn2

I'm still unsure if I've made a mistake or not, as when i make x=π/4 i don't get 1 at n=0 like in the sequence but do get -0.37 for n=1. could that mean a mistake in the equation for the even term?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Hi there,

Yes, sorry, the (-1)n re-appears if you go back from summing 2n+1 to summing n .

I've been piling error on top of error in this exercise (*) as well (nobody is perfect), but I convinced myself you are perfectly correct (I cheated by finding the series in a textbook example). Even made a plot for the first eight terms:

Fourier_sawtooth.jpg


Nice to see a triangle (no discontinuities) is easier to reproduce than a sawtooth !


Now I'm not sure what you mean with "when i make x=π/4 i don't get 1 at n=0 like in the sequence"

You make x a certain value and you add a good number of terms. At n = 0 you are supposed to get only the π/4 and the summation for the sines and cosines start at n = 1.

Going back to your original exercise: to show π/4 = 1 - 1/3 + 1/5 you need a value for x that makes the cosine terms to go away. In fact the plot above makes the choice obvious ! So sorry for spoiling :wink: ...


(*) E.g. the ##\ ... \sin ((2n+1)x)## in post #8 should have been ##\ ... \sin (nx)##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K