Fourier transform of hyperbolic tangent

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Fourier transform of the hyperbolic tangent function, denoted as ##\mathcal{F}[\text{tanh}(t)](\omega)##, is analytically expressed as ##-i \, \pi \, \text{csch}\left(\frac{\pi \omega}{2}\right)##, with the principal part considered for singularities at ##\omega=0##. The integral ##\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-i\omega t} \text{tanh}(bt) dt## does not converge as a classical Riemann integral but exists as a generalized function. Techniques such as contour integration and the relationship between the derivative of the hyperbolic tangent and the hyperbolic secant squared function are essential for deriving this result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms, specifically the definition ##\mathcal{F}[f(t)](\omega) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dt\, e^{-i\omega t} \, f(t)##.
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions, particularly ##\text{tanh}(t)## and ##\text{sech}^2(t)##.
  • Familiarity with contour integration techniques in complex analysis.
  • Basic understanding of generalized functions and distributions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of contour integration in evaluating Fourier transforms.
  • Study the properties and applications of generalized functions, focusing on distributions.
  • Explore the Fourier transform of related functions, such as the error function ##\text{erf}(t)##.
  • Investigate the implications of singularities in Fourier transforms and methods for handling them.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with signal processing, particularly those interested in the Fourier analysis of hyperbolic functions and generalized functions.

jjr
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Hello

I am trying to determine the Fourier transform of the hyperbolic tangent function. I don't have a lot of experience with Fourier transforms and after searching for a bit I've come up empty handed on this specific issue.

So what I want to calculate is:

##\int\limits_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-it\omega}\text{tanh}(bt) dt##

where ##b## is some constant.

Using ##\text{tanh}(bt)=\frac{e^{bt}-e^{-bt}}{e^{bt}+e^{-bt}}## leads to a mess of exponential functions, and does not bring me closer to a solution. Perhaps there is some other way, using tricks specific to calculating Fourier transforms that could be helpful here?

Any suggestions are most appreciated

J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think the integral converges.
 
Sorry, I should of course have added that running it through WolframAlpha returns

##\mathcal{F}_t[\text{tanh}(t)](\omega) = i\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\text{csch}\left(\frac{\pi\omega}{2}\right)##

which I'm hoping to obtain analytically
 
This is an interesting problem. The original integral does not exist as a classical Riemann integral, but the Fourier transform exists, at least as a generalized function (ie, in the same way that ##\mathcal{F}\left[ 1 \right](\omega) = 2\pi\delta(\omega)##, or ##\mathcal{F}\left[ sgn(t)\right](\omega)=2 \, \mathcal{P} \frac{1}{\omega}##, where sgn(t) = 1 for t>0 and -1 for t<0, and ##\mathcal{P}## refers to the principle part).

One way to proceed may be to use the fact that ##\frac{d}{dt}\tanh(t) = \text{sech}^2(t)##, so that
##i\omega\mathcal{F}\left[ \tanh(t)\right](\omega) = \mathcal{F}\left[ \text{sech}^2(t)\right](\omega)##. Now you have an integral, ##\mathcal{F}\left[ \text{sech}^2(t)\right](\omega)## that is nicely behaved as in improper Riemann integral, and you may be able apply contour integration or some other technique.

Note that in the above I have been assuming the definition ##\mathcal{F}[f(t)](\omega) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dt\, e^{-i\omega t} \, f(t)##. I think Wolfram has the ##2\pi## in the exponent, so if you just ask for the Fourier transform the constants won't be the same. So while the result from Wolframalpha may have constants that are not quite right for your definition of the Fourier transform, qualitatively the result seems plausible. This is because ## \text{csch}(\omega)## qualitatively looks like ##\frac{1}{\omega}## (especially near zero, which is what matters when b is large), and as ##b\rightarrow \infty##, ##\tanh(b t)## seems to "converge" (in the sense of distributions) to ##sgn(t)##.

Jason
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2, jjr and blue_leaf77
Update: using contour integration I find
##\mathcal{F}\left[ \text{sech}^2(t)\right](\omega) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dt\, e^{-i\omega t}\, \text{sech}^2(t) = \pi \omega \, \text{csch}\left(\frac{\pi \omega}{2} \right)##

What do you get?

Jason

edit: by the way, I think (although I am not sure) that this means that the answer to your original problem is,
##\mathcal{F}\left[ \text{tanh}(t)\right](\omega) = -i \, \pi \, \mathcal{P}\, \text{csch}\left(\frac{\pi \omega}{2} \right)##.

If you aren't worried about specifying how to treat the singularity at ##\omega=0## then you can get rid of the principle part and use
##\mathcal{F}\left[ \text{tanh}(t)\right](\omega) = -i \, \pi \, \text{csch}\left(\frac{\pi \omega}{2} \right)##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and jjr
jasonRF said:
Update: using contour integration I find
##\mathcal{F}\left[ \text{sech}^2(t)\right](\omega) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty dt\, e^{-i\omega t}\, \text{sech}^2(t) = \pi \omega \, \text{csch}\left(\frac{\pi \omega}{2} \right)##

What do you get?

Jason

edit: by the way, I think (although I am not sure) that this means that the answer to your original problem is,
##\mathcal{F}\left[ \text{tanh}(t)\right](\omega) = -i \, \pi \, \mathcal{P}\, \text{csch}\left(\frac{\pi \omega}{2} \right)##.

If you aren't worried about specifying how to treat the singularity at ##\omega=0## then you can get rid of the principle part and use
##\mathcal{F}\left[ \text{tanh}(t)\right](\omega) = -i \, \pi \, \text{csch}\left(\frac{\pi \omega}{2} \right)##

I ended up going a different route. I was working with the ##\text{tanh}(t)## function because I needed something that closely resembles the error function ##\text{erf}(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int_{-t}^t e^{-t'^2}dt'##, for which I initially couldn't find the F.T. I managed to calculate it after all, and so didn't need the F.T. of ##\text{tanh}(t)##.

Thanks for your help. Since this seems to be a rather unique question hopefully the thread can help someone else at some point.

J
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Actually, this is helpful to me, as I need the FT of a differential amplifier characteristic, which is tanh(). Thank you for your postings!

Yet Another Grad Student
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and jasonRF

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K