At page 285 in Peskin and Schroeder's Introduction to quantum field theory the author defines the integration measure [itex]D\phi = \Pi_i d\phi(x_i)[/itex] where space-time is being discretised into a square lattice of volume L^4. He proceeds by Fourier-transforming(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] \phi(k_n) = \frac{1}{V} \sum_n e^{-i k_n \cdot x_i} \phi(k_n)[/tex]

and considering only [itex]k^0_n >0[/itex] as independent variables he concludes that since the fourier transformation is unitary, the measure [itex]D\phi = \Pi_i d\phi(x_i)[/itex] can equivalently be expressed as (equation 9.22)

[tex] D\phi = \Pi_{k_n^0 > 0} d Re \phi(k_n) d Im \phi(k_n).[/tex]

Why is he only considering [itex]k^0_n >0[/itex] and how does he arrive at this conclusion? What is the relevance of the fourier transform being unitary?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fourier transform of integration measure (Peskin and Schroeder)

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Fourier transform integration | Date |
---|---|

I Fourier conjugates and momentum | Oct 3, 2017 |

I 'Normalisation' of Fourier Transforms in QFT | Aug 1, 2017 |

I Why is momentum the Fourier transform of position? | Apr 16, 2017 |

A Conjugate variables in the Fourier and Legendre transforms | Nov 7, 2016 |

A I've tried to read the reason for using Fourier transform | Oct 24, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**