Fourier transform of signum function*exponential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the Fourier transform of the product of the signum function and an exponential function, specifically sgn(x)*e^(-a*abs(x-2)). The discussion centers around the properties of Fourier transforms and the implications of changing the limits of integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of changing the limits of integration based on the behavior of the function across different intervals. There is a consideration of how the signum function affects the integral and whether certain properties of Fourier transforms can be applied.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the convolution theorem, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original poster's uncertainty about using LaTeX for mathematical expressions, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. Additionally, the implications of the exponential term in the Fourier transform are under scrutiny.

quebecois22
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using properties of the Fourier transform, calculate the Fourier transform of: sgn(x)*e^(-a*abs(x-2))

Homework Equations



FT(f(x))= integral from -∞ to +∞ of f(x)*e^(-iwx) dx

The Attempt at a Solution



I've realized that with the signum function, the boundaries of the integral can be reduced to: integral from 0 to 4 of e^(-a*abs(x-2))*e^(-iwx) dx from 0 to 4. However I'm guessing that I just can't use the properties and theorems related to Fourier transforms as the integral does not have the same boundaries as the original... Maybe I just souldn't have changed the integral...Any help?

Sorry for not using latex I really don't understand it =/
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0040.jpg
    IMG_0040.jpg
    24.2 KB · Views: 831
Physics news on Phys.org
What was your reasoning that you could change the limits to 0 and 4?
 
The function from -∞ to 0 is the opposite of the function from 4 to ∞ so they cancel out. Can I do that?
 
That's true for f(x) but not for f(x)e-iωx. The exponential messes things up.
 
Ahh indeed :(... How should I approach it then?
 
I suggest using the convolution theorem. Or just grind it out — it doesn't look like there's anything tricky going on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K