Fourier Transformation - Convolution quick question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Fourier transformation of the convolution of a rectangular function and shifted delta functions. The user correctly applies the convolution theorem but encounters discrepancies in the exponential terms during integration. The correct transformation involves recognizing that the shift in the rectangular function is by 3 units, not 3/5, leading to the correct application of the Fourier transform properties. The final result should reflect this shift accurately, ensuring consistency with the convolution theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Transform properties
  • Knowledge of convolution theorem in signal processing
  • Familiarity with delta functions and their properties
  • Experience with rectangular functions and their Fourier transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Fourier Transform of rectangular functions
  • Learn about the convolution theorem in detail
  • Explore the implications of shifting functions in Fourier analysis
  • Practice solving Fourier transforms involving delta functions and convolutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in signal processing, electrical engineering, and applied mathematics who are working with Fourier transformations and convolution operations.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Okay the question is to find the Fourier transform of:

rect([itex]\frac{x}{5})[/itex][itex]\otimes[/itex]([itex]\delta[/itex](x+3)-[itex]\delta[/itex](x-3))

=F[itex]^{\infty}_{\infty}[/itex] [itex]\int[/itex]rect([itex]\frac{x'}{5}[/itex])([itex]\delta[/itex](x+3-x')-[itex]\delta[/itex](x-3-x')) dx' [1]

- where F represents a Fourier transform.
My Issue
Okay I am fine doing this using the convolution theorem, that the Fourier transform of a convultion is given by the product of the two individual Fourier transforms, but I am having trouble doing it explicitly

So from [1] integrating over each delta function, I deduce that the first term collapses everywhere except x'=x+3, and the second everywhere except x'=x-3, . So I get:

F(rect[itex]\frac{x+3}{5}[/itex]-rect[itex]\frac{x-3}{5})[/itex]
= (5sinc[itex]\frac{5k}{2}[/itex]exp[itex]^{\frac{3ik}{5}}[/itex]exp[itex]^{\frac{-3ik}{5}}[/itex])
using the properties that F(rect([itex]\frac{x}{1}[/itex]))=asinc([itex]\frac{ka}{2}[/itex]) and that F(f(x+a))=F(f(x))exp[itex]^{ika}[/itex]

Which does not agree with the convultion theorem were I get :

5sinc[itex]\frac{5k}{2}[/itex]exp[itex]^{3ik}[/itex]exp[itex]^{-3ik}[/itex]

Thanks a lot in advance for any assistance !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
So from [1] integrating over each delta function, I deduce that the first term collapses everywhere except x'=x+3, and the second everywhere except x'=x-3, so I get:
$$F\left[\mathrm{rect }\left(\frac{x+3}{5}\right) -\mathrm{rect }\left(\frac{x-3}{5}\right)\right] =
5\mathrm{sinc }\left(\frac{5k}{2}\right)e^{3ik/5}e^{-3ik/5}$$ using the properties that ##F\left[\mathrm{rect }\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\right]=a\mathrm{sinc }\left(\frac{ka}{2}\right)## and that ##F[f(x+a)] = F[f(x)]e^{ika}##. This does not agree with the convolution theorem where I get:
$$5\mathrm{sinc }\left(\frac{5k}{2}\right)e^{3ik}e^{-3ik}$$
Why are the exponentials being multiplied in both cases? In fact, if they were supposed to be multiplied, they'd cancel in both cases, leaving you with identical but incorrect answers.

Your mistake is in determining the shift. You're shifting rect(x/5) by 3, not 3/5, because to go from rect(x/5) to rect((x±3)/5), you replace x by x±3, not x±3/5.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K