Fourier Transfrom of scaled periodic impulse train

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Fourier transform of a scaled periodic impulse train is represented as X(jω) = 2πΣ[δ(ω - π(2k))] + πΣ[δ(ω - π(2k + 1))], where k ranges from -∞ to +∞. This formulation accounts for alternating impulse values of 2 and 1 at specific intervals. The periodic nature of the pulse train, with impulses at t = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, is crucial for accurately defining the transform. The discussion clarifies the need for a modified equation to reflect the varying amplitudes of the impulses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with impulse functions and delta functions
  • Knowledge of periodic functions and their representations
  • Basic skills in mathematical notation and summation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of delta functions in Fourier analysis
  • Learn about periodic functions and their Fourier series representations
  • Explore advanced topics in signal processing, particularly impulse trains
  • Investigate the implications of scaling in Fourier transforms
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, signal processing, and applied mathematics who are working with Fourier transforms and impulse functions.

neg_ion13
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Fourier transform of scaled pulse train from -inf to +inf. Starting at 0 the first impulse is scaled at 2, the second impulse at 1 is scaled as 1, third at three scaled at 2, etc...

Homework Equations


Does my solution look correct?

The Attempt at a Solution



X(jw) = 2\Pi\Sigma\delta(w - \Pik) + \Pi\Sigma\delta(w - \Pi(k + 1))
the sigma notation is from k = -inf to inf. My thinking behind this is to represent a pulse for each scaled delta funciton in freq domain
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
neg_ion13 said:

Homework Statement


Fourier transform of scaled pulse train from -inf to +inf. Starting at 0 the first impulse is scaled at 2, the second impulse at 1 is scaled as 1, third at three scaled at 2, etc...
I'm having trouble seeing any pattern in the pulse train you describe. Is there no pulse at t=2? What about the pulses at negative times?

Homework Equations

The transform of a simple pulse train might come in useful here.

Does my solution look correct?

The Attempt at a Solution



X(jw) = 2\Pi\Sigma\delta(w - \Pik) + \Pi\Sigma\delta(w - \Pi(k + 1))
the sigma notation is from k = -inf to inf. My thinking behind this is to represent a pulse for each scaled delta funciton in freq domain
If you can describe the input pulse train better, it will be easier for us to see what is going on.
 
The pulse train is periodic so it runs from plus -inf to +inf.
At t = -2 the impulse = 2
At t = -1 the impulse = 1
At t = 0 the impulse = 2
At t = 1 the impulse = 1
At t = 2 the impulse = 2
At t = 3 the impulse = 1
At t = 4 the impulse = 2
Etc... from -inf to +inf
 
neg_ion13 said:
The pulse train is periodic so it runs from plus -inf to +inf.
At t = -2 the impulse = 2
At t = -1 the impulse = 1
At t = 0 the impulse = 2
At t = 1 the impulse = 1
At t = 2 the impulse = 2
At t = 3 the impulse = 1
At t = 4 the impulse = 2
Etc... from -inf to +inf
Thank you for clarifying that.
neg_ion13 said:
Does my solution look correct?

The Attempt at a Solution



X(jw) = 2\Pi\Sigma\delta(w - \Pik) + \Pi\Sigma\delta(w - \Pi(k + 1))
the sigma notation is from k = -inf to inf. My thinking behind this is to represent a pulse for each scaled delta funciton in freq domain
No, it does not look correct. Can you show your work?
 
The Fourier transform for a pulse train is 2*pi*sigma*delta(w - 2*pi/T). Here T = 2. the problem is that a regular pulse train has a constant value of 1 for the impulse while this one does not. This means the above equation needs to be modified to alternate between value of 2 and a value of 1. That is how I arrived at the above equation. The first part of the equation is for value of 2. When k = 0 the first part 2*pi. The second part = pi when w = pi, etc... This was my thinking behind this X(jw). Because it's linear I could split the problem into two summations to represent each of the 2 values of the delta function.
 
Oops! I am overwriting my impulses. It should be:

X(jw) = 2*pi*Sigma[delta(w - pi*(2k))] + pi*Sigma[delta(w - pi*(2k + 1))]
 
Okay, I agree with your solution now. I had in mind expressing it a different way, but it is equivalent to what you have.

What I had in mind:
X(ω) = π(∑δ(ω-πk) + ∑δ(ω-2πk))

where k runs from -∞ to +∞.
 
Cool. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K