Fraction of light reflected inside a diamond

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Fresnel equations in the context of total internal reflection in diamonds. The user calculated reflection coefficients for s-polarized light (r_s = 0.296) and p-polarized light (r_p = 0.522) using indices of refraction n_i = 2.42 and n_t = 1, but encountered confusion regarding the transmitted angle (θ_t) when the incident angle (θ_i) exceeds the critical angle (θ_c = 24.4°). It was clarified that for angles greater than the critical angle, the transmitted angle does not exist as a real number, and the Fresnel reflection coefficient becomes complex with a magnitude of 1. The equations remain valid and can be expressed solely in terms of the incident angle and index of refraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fresnel equations
  • Knowledge of total internal reflection
  • Familiarity with complex numbers in optics
  • Basic principles of light polarization (s and p-polarization)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Fresnel equations in detail
  • Explore the implications of complex reflection coefficients in optics
  • Investigate the concept of critical angles in various materials
  • Learn about light polarization and its effects on reflection and transmission
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physicists, and anyone interested in the behavior of light in materials, particularly in the context of total internal reflection and polarization effects.

Davidllerenav
Messages
424
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Diamonds have an index of refraction of n = 2.42 which allows total internal
reflection to occur at relatively shallow angles of incidence. What fraction of the light reflects for internal angles ##\theta_i = 40.5^°## and ##\theta_i = 50.6^°##?
Relevant Equations
Fresnel equations
Snell's law
So i do now that it is a case of total internal reflection, but i didn't get R=1 for ##\theta_i=40.5^°##. I used the Fresnel equations for both s and p-polarized light and for s I got ##r_s=\frac{n_i\cos\theta_i-n_t\cos\theta_t}{n_i\cos\theta_i+
n_t\cos\theta_t}=0.296## using ##n_i=2.42## and ##n_t=1##. For p I got ##r_p=\frac{n_i\cos\theta_t-n_t\cos\theta_i}{n_i\cos\theta_t+
n_t\cos\theta_i}=0.522##. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What values are you using for ##\theta_t##?
 
nasu said:
What values are you using for ##\theta_t##?
Well since both incident angles are greater than the critical angle ##\theta_c=24.4^°##, then ##\theta_t=0##.
 
Are Fresnel's equations still valid beyond the critical angle?
 
haruspex said:
Are Fresnel's equations still valid beyond the critical angle?
I thought so, but reading the chapter again I think not because the transmited angle isn't in facr zero, but complex.
 
Davidllerenav said:
Well since both incident angles are greater than the critical angle ##\theta_c=24.4^°##, then ##\theta_t=0##.
No, the angle is not zero. For angles larger than the critical angle there is no real ##\theta_c ##. The Fresnel reflection coefficient becomes a complex number with a magnitude of 1 for any angle larger than the critical angle. The phase of the complex coefficient still changes with the angle but the magnitude doesn't. Fresnel's equations are still valid. They can be written in terms of just incident angle and index of refraction so there is no problem with the transmission angle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Davidllerenav

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K