Fraction of thermally excited atoms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electronic transition of a neon atom, specifically focusing on the energy emitted at a wavelength of 746nm and estimating the fraction of thermally excited atoms at 300K. The subject area includes concepts from quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of energy using the formula E = hc/λ and express concerns about the simplicity of the approach. There are attempts to apply the Boltzmann distribution to find the probability of thermal excitation, with questions about the correct formulation and interpretation of the probability function.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the validity of certain formulas and constants. Some have provided alternative formulations for the probability of excitation, while others are exploring the implications of having multiple energy states. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the role of different energy levels in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions related to the number of energy states considered and the implications of temperature on the probabilities calculated. Participants express uncertainty regarding the energy required for transitions beyond the first excited state.

VoteSaxon
Messages
25
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


There is an electronic transition between the first energy state and the ground state of a neon atom, emitting a wavelength of 746nm. The question asks for the energy of the transition and an estimate of the fraction of atoms in a sample that is thermally excited at 300K.

Homework Equations


My guess:
E = hc/λ.
P(E) ∝ √E⋅e-E/kT

The Attempt at a Solution


So surely finding the energy is easy:
E = hc/λ = (6.63x10-34)(3x108)/(746x10-9) = 2.666x10-19 J ≈ 2.7x10-19 J

However, I have a feeling this is too simple and might be incorrect.

For the probability, I suppose you use the Boltzmann Distributuon:
P(E) ∝ √E⋅e-E/kT
∴P(E) ∝ 6.43x10-38

But this is probably just the probability of getting exactly the energy value above - what I really want (I think) is the probability of the energy being equal to or greater than the energy value calculated above, i.e. the probability of E ≥ 2.7x10-19 J

Can someone point me in the right direction, and tell me where I might have gone wrong?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Where does the sqrt(E) in your formula come from? The units don't match.
VoteSaxon said:
But this is probably just the probability of getting exactly the energy value above - what I really want (I think) is the probability of the energy being equal to or greater than the energy value calculated above
You just consider two states, there are no other energy values.
 
mfb said:
Where does the sqrt(E) in your formula come from? The units don't match.

It is proven in meticulous detail in my lecture notes, but let's just go with p(E) = Ae-E/kT as this is always correct - basically the √E was just part of the constant A.

mfb said:
You just consider two states, there are no other energy values.

Ahh, because Ne has 2 electron 'shells,' correct?
So the probability of being excited from ground state to first energy level P(E) ∝ e-2.7x10-19/(1.38x10-23)(300) ≈ 4.75x10-29
How do I involve the second shell now? Because I don't know the energy required to get excited up to there.

Thanks a lot for replying.
 
A constant cannot depend on energy, that is the purpose of a constant.
VoteSaxon said:
Ahh, because Ne has 2 electron 'shells,' correct?
Two states: ground state and excited state.
VoteSaxon said:
How do I involve the second shell now? Because I don't know the energy required to get excited up to there.
That's the value you calculated in the line before, with the energy you calculated in post 1.

For much larger temperatures you would have to take into account that P(0) would deviate from 1. Then you have to calculate a prefactor (which is the same for all states, it does not depend on energy), but this is not necessary here.
 
mfb said:
A constant cannot depend on energy, that is the purpose of a constant.
Two states: ground state and excited state.
That's the value you calculated in the line before, with the energy you calculated in post 1.

For much larger temperatures you would have to take into account that P(0) would deviate from 1. Then you have to calculate a prefactor (which is the same for all states, it does not depend on energy), but this is not necessary here.

Sorry, I'm being slow, but you say to just consider two energy states, and yet if I am trying to find the probability of Ne being excited at 300K, the probability of being in the ground state is not really useful, and I am back with only one energy value that I can plug in.

Thanks for your patience.
 
The probability to be in the ground state is extremely close to 1. The probability to be in the excited state is the 10-29 number you calculated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
908
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K