Franchise and voting rights based on measured intellectual capacity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mark!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacity Voting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the restrictions of voting rights based on measured intellectual capacity, specifically highlighting nations that disenfranchise individuals with learning impairments, mental health issues, or neurological impairments. The conversation references the province of Québec, Canada, where individuals can be declared incapacitated by a judge based on medical evaluations, thus losing their voting rights. Historical context is provided through the eugenics movement and Soviet practices, illustrating how mental health definitions can be politicized. The discussion emphasizes the complexities surrounding the measurement of intellectual capacity and its implications for voting eligibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of voting rights and suffrage laws
  • Knowledge of mental health evaluations and legal incapacitation processes
  • Familiarity with historical contexts such as the eugenics movement
  • Awareness of the legal framework surrounding guardianship in Québec
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the voting rights laws in various countries regarding intellectual capacity
  • Examine the legal processes for declaring someone incapacitated in different jurisdictions
  • Study the historical implications of the eugenics movement on modern voting rights
  • Investigate the impact of mental health definitions on civil rights and voting eligibility
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for legal scholars, mental health professionals, policymakers, and advocates for voting rights who are interested in the intersection of mental health, legal capacity, and civil liberties.

mark!
Messages
150
Reaction score
13
On Wikipedia, it says:
"Eligibility - Some nations restrict the franchise based on measured intellectual capacity".

I've been searching on Google for a pretty long time now, but I can't seem to find the answer to what I'm looking for. My only simply and short question is:

Which nations?

To what nations is the article is referring here? The article further says:
"Potential voters with learning impairments, mental health issues, or neurological impairments may also find themselves barred from voting by law".
Again, referring to voters with learning impairments. I'd like to know how these impairments are being measured, and where the line is drawn, and why.

If anybody knows the answer to this, I'm very curious to hear it! Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
While not specifically about the franchise, studying the eugenics movement should provide historical perspective for disenfranchising citizens based on health concerns.

Though somewhat tangential as the USSR was not a democracy, Soviet rules and laws defining 'anti-social activities' as a form of mental illness treatable in mental hospitals might provide examples of politicizing mental health definitions to serve authority. The subject of disenfranchising criminals leads to an examination of what constitutes a crime and how a society organizes its criminal justice system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
Here, in the province of Québec in Canada, you can be declared incapacitated, which mean you cannot make decisions for yourself. Not only you don't have the right to vote, but you cannot have a bank account or buy a house or make any kind of contract. Someone else is appointed to do it for you. If there is no one, the government (the 'Curateur public') is taking charge. These people will also take charge of the finance of minors who don't have a legal tutor (like a parent).

Only a judge can declare you incapacitated and this is done based on medical & psychological evaluations and hearing testimonials from surrounding people. It is a reversible process (still done by a judge). You can prepare this moment in your life by filling a protection mandate which will be considered at the hearing.

For example, my grandmother had such mandate. When she reached a certain age (in her late 80's), she had trouble following everything and it was too difficult for her to follow all the bureaucracy (taxes, bank accounts, investments, etc.), so she asked her kids to do what was necessary to get relieved of those responsabilities. She wasn't crazy or anything, life was just too exhausting for her. You just follow the procedure, meet the professionals, go in front of judge and it is done (unless there is strong opposition).

The funny thing was that afterwards, my grandmother wished to vote in the next election. My mother told her she legally couldn't anymore and refused to take her, but my grandmother wasn't fully grasping the situation. One of my uncle was tired of hearing her complaining, so he took her anyway. Nobody had bother to remove her name from the electoral list, so she was able to do it even though she wasn't allowed legally.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, BillTre, berkeman and 1 other person

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K