How can I solve Fredholm Integral Equations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter apalmer3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving Fredholm Integral Equations, specifically inhomogeneous equations of the second kind. The example provided is u(x) = cos(x) + λ∫sin(x-y)u(y)dy with limits from 0 to π. The solution approach involves recognizing the separability of the kernel K(x,t) and transforming the equation into a solvable form. Key steps include rewriting the equation, multiplying by B(x), and integrating to derive a numerical equation that leads to the solution for y(x).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fredholm Integral Equations
  • Knowledge of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with separable functions and kernels
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra for solving systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fredholm Integral Equations in detail
  • Learn about separable kernels and their applications in integral equations
  • Explore numerical methods for solving integral equations
  • Investigate the differences between Fredholm and Volterra Integral Equations
USEFUL FOR

Students in applied analysis, mathematicians, and researchers working on integral equations, particularly those focusing on Fredholm Integral Equations and their solutions.

apalmer3
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hello All!

I am currently in an Applied Analysis class, and I'm trying to do a little research outside of the classroom to try and understand what my teacher is trying to say.

So, I'm supposed to understand how to solve Fredholm Integral Equations (inhomogeneous and of the second kind). Would anybody be willing to help me understand?

Here's an example problem from the notes:

u(x) = cos(x) + \lambda\intsin(x-y)u(y)dy

The limits of the integral are from 0 to \pi.

I'm supposed to solve for u(x), and I'm not exactly sure how. I know that, if it were a Volterra equation, I could solve it by convolution. Is it the same for a Fredholm equation? Or is there a better approach?

Thanks so very very much!
Abigail
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I consider Fredholm equations to be much simpler than Volterra equations!

In general, a "Fredholm" integral equation is of the form
y(x)= \int_a^b K(x,t)y(t)dt+ u(x)

Start with the simple case: if K(x,t)= A(x)B(t), that is, if the kernel is "separable" you can do the following: Let
X= \int_a^b B(t)y(t)dt[/itex]<br /> C= \int_a^b A(x)B(x)dx[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; and &lt;br /&gt; D= \int_a^b B(x)u(x)dx[/itex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Notice that these are all numbers (X is a numerical variable).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; The integral equation can be rewritten as&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; y(x)= X A(x)+ u(x)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Multiply both sides of the integeral equation by B(x):&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; B(x)y(x)= X A(x)B(x) + B(x)u(x)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; and integrate from a to b:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; X= CX+ D, a numerical equation from which we can solve (1-C)X= D so X= D/(1- C).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; The solution to the integral equation is y(x)+ XA(x)+ u(x)= DA(x)/(1- C)+ u(x).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; If K(x,t) is NOT separable, you can write it as a sum (finite or infinite) of &amp;amp;quot;separable terms&amp;amp;quot;: A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(x)B&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(x)+ A&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(x)B&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(x)+ ... and get a system of linear equations for &amp;amp;quot;X&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot; rather than a single equation. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; In your particular case, it helps to remember that sin(x- y)= sin(x)cos(y)- cos(x)sin(y).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K