I have the following expression :(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

$$ y_{E} = \int_{0}^{\infty} 0.5 * [E_{1}(µ(E)*r) - E_{1}(\frac{µ(E)*r}{cos \alpha})] * f(r) dr $$

where :

- $y_{E}$ has been measured for some E (something like 5 different $E_{i}$, to give you an idea)

- µ(E) is retrieved from a table in the litterature (basically that means I have no analytical expression for µ(E) but I can easily get access for its value). If you're curious about the shape of that thing in function of E, here is the link : https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/ElemTab/z82.html

- E1 is the exponential integral function

My goal is to find f(r).

This can be rewritten in the following form :

$$ y_{E} = \int_{0}^{\infty} K(E;r) * f(r) dr $$

which (thx wikipedia) is called a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind. And which is very ugly to solve from what i've read. :'(

I would like to introduce a parametrization of f(r) as the following :

$$f(r) = C*e^{-\lambda_{1}*(r+\lambda_{3})} * [1-e^{-\lambda_{2}*(r+\lambda_{3})}]$$

The justification for this form is that i know f(r) usually has a profile where it increases then exponentially descreases. So I think such an expression is okay. Of course if there was a way to solve this without postulating such a hard thing, that would be better.

Anyway, so basically an expression of 4 parameters : lambdas 1, 2, 3 and C. If I can find a decent approximation of these 4 parameters, I will be a happy man.

From there, if you have any suggestion how to solve this, my ears are wide open.

I have tried the following :

First I introduced a quadrature form. I choosed a Gauss-Laguerre one, because of the limits on the integral from 0 to infinity, but I have no idea if that is a good choice. I've read Gauss-Laguerre works great to estimate an integral with a polynomial function multiplied by an exponential, but here I have no polynomial function but rather 2 ugly exponential integral E1 which probably behaves very differently, particulary close to 0+. So is it a wise idea?

Anyway, by doing so, I can get some kind of linear system :

$$\hat{K} \hat{f} = \hat{g}$$

where :

Kij = K'(Ei;rj)

fj=f(rj) with j going from 1 to n

gi=y(Ei) with i going from 1 to m

n is something like 15 or more (to get enough points in the G-L quadrature for a decent fit)

m is, as previously stated, around 5 or so.

So K is not a square matrix, and the system is clearly undertermined because n>m.

But since all the fj only depend on 4 parameters only, this looks like some kind of 5 equations with 4 unknown, but non-linear (because of the expression of f). Am I correct on this ?

And if so, how to solve this to find my 4 parameters ?

As already said, any idea would be greatly appreciated, and thank you for reading this !

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Solving this integral equation

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Solving integral equation |
---|

I Solving an integral |

I Solving integral |

I Understanding an integral |

B Solve for x (natural log equation) |

B How do I solve this integral? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**