Free fall from rest at a particular radius to the central singularity

happyparticle
Messages
490
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Proper time from rest at a particular radius to the central singularity
Relevant Equations
Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates
##ds^2 = - (1-\frac{2M}{r}) dt^2 + 2dtdr +r^2 d\Omega^2##
I have this problem:
1743564221242.png

First of all, I would like to have an equation for the proper time.
I was using the Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates in the Schwarzschild metric : $$ds^2 = - (1-\frac{2M}{r}) dt^2 + 2dtdr +r^2 d\Omega^2$$
Knowing that the observer falls radially, thus ##d\phi = d\theta = 0##.

Also, ##ds^2 = -d\tau^2 ## and after a little algebra we get:
$$1 = (1-\frac{2M}{r}) (\frac{dt}{d\tau})^2 - 2 \frac{dt dr}{d\tau^2}$$

I'm pretty stuck here. I found here and there that the equation for the proper time in this situation should be ##\tau = \frac{\pi r_0^{3/2}}{2\sqrt{2M}}##.

I guess I need to find the value for ##\frac{dt}{d\tau}##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
happyparticle said:
I was using the Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates in the Schwarzschild metric : $$ds^2 = - (1-\frac{2M}{r}) dt^2 + 2dtdr +r^2 d\Omega^2$$
Knowing that the observer falls radially, thus ##d\phi = d\theta = 0##.

Also, ##ds^2 = -d\tau^2 ## and after a little algebra we get:
$$1 = (1-\frac{2M}{r}) (\frac{dt}{d\tau})^2 - 2 \frac{dt dr}{d\tau^2}$$
OK

happyparticle said:
I'm pretty stuck here.

I guess I need to find the value for ##\frac{dt}{d\tau}##.
You can get an expression for ##\frac{dt}{d\tau}## by noting that free fall is motion along a geodesic. The equations of motion for a geodesic can be found using a variational principle. For example, see the first page of these notes. Here, they are working in Schwarzschild coordinates and arrive at the bottom of the page with an expression for ##\dot t \equiv \dfrac {dt}{d \tau}##. You can apply the same method when using Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top