Free Fall of Objects Considering the Acelleration of the Planet

AI Thread Summary
Different masses falling from the same height on a planet will hit the ground simultaneously if air resistance is negligible and the planet's mass is significantly larger than the falling objects. In Gilberto's analysis, he considers the gravitational acceleration of both the falling bodies and the planet, noting that while the accelerations of the bodies toward the planet are equal, the planet's acceleration toward the heavier body is greater. This leads to the conclusion that the heavier object would reach the ground first if the planet's motion is taken into account. However, the principle that all bodies fall at the same rate holds true only when the mass of the falling objects is much smaller than that of the planet. Overall, the discussion highlights the nuances of gravitational interactions in free fall scenarios.
Gilbfa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear members,

My name is Gilberto F. A. and I would like to ask your help regarding a topic in Gravitation. I have formal education in engineering and recently, as part of an attempt to refresh my knowledge of physics I started to study again on my spare time whenever I can.

A few days ago I came across a subtle problem regarding Gravitation which is puzzling me. Just to be clear this is not homework nor a prank. The question is the following:

Do bodies with different masses falling from the same height, with zero initial velocity really hit the ground of a planet at the same time when the acceleration of the planet is also considered?

Regarding this question I would like to ask your opinion and please read the entire message before answering as this question of mine is really subtle.

By the way I am aware of Galileo's experiment about the free falling objects from a tower and of the experiment made at the moon regarding the simultaneous falling of a feather and a hammer.

Before going into much detail I would like to state the hypothesizes of this “experiment”. Here they are:

- Consider there is no air resistance or any other dissipative resistance to motion;
- Consider that the planet where the experiment will be carried-out does not rotate around its axis, nor does this planet orbit another celestial body;
- Consider that the velocities involved in the experiment are much lower than the speed of light so that relativistic effects need not be considered;
- Consider two falling objects with different masses falling at this planet. The first with mass m1 (named “Body 1”) and the second with mass m2=2*m1 (named “Body 2”);
- Consider this is a “small planet” with mass m3=10*m1;
- Consider that each object will fall exactly from the same height such that the distance between the centers of the bodies involved in the experiment is “d” and that they fall with initial velocity equal to zero;
- Consider that each object will fall in different occasions and in isolation, that is:
Case 1: When the first body is falling consider that the only bodies present are m1 (“Body 1”) and the planet;
Case 2: When the second body is falling consider that the only bodies present are m2 (“Body 2”) and the planet;
- Consider also the acceleration of the “small planet” toward the falling body.

Considering the hypothesizes above I will examine Case 1 first and then Case 2.

Case 1:

Considering Newton's Gravitation Law for two bodies with masses m and m' separated by a distance “d”, F=G*m*m'/d^2, the acceleration of the first body (“Body 1”) towards the planet is a1= G*m3/d^2.

Doing the same for the acceleration of the planet towards the first body, you get ap= G*m1/d^2

Case 2:

In this case, the acceleration of the second body (“Body 2”) towards the planet is a2= G*m3/d^2, which is the same as the acceleration of “Body 1” towards the planet.

Regarding the acceleration of the planet towards the second body, its value is ap = G*m2/d^2 = 2*G*m1/d^2, which is twice the value of the acceleration of the planet towards “Body 1”.

Comparing these 2 cases, you see that the accelerations of the 2 bodies towards the planet are the same, however the accelerations of the planet towards each body are different. In this view, the body with a bigger mass will hit the planet's ground in a shorter period of time.

What am I missing here?



Gilberto F. A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Gilberto, welcome to PF!

Gilbfa said:
What am I missing here?
Nothing, your reasoning is correct. The "all bodies fall equally fast" statement is true only for masses of falling bodies much lower than the mass of the planet, where motion of the planet can be neglected.
 
Hi Bandersnatch,

Thank you for your reply! I guess I missed this subtle point the first time I studied this subject...Gilberto
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top