Free fall question, where has my reasoning gone wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter emyt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Free fall
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bolt dropped from an elevator 9.0 ft above the ground. The initial calculations by participants yield a time of 0.75 seconds for the bolt to hit the ground, while the textbook states 0.71 seconds. The confusion arises from the initial velocity of the bolt, which is equal to the elevator's upward speed of 8.0 ft/s, and the need to account for both the gravitational acceleration of 32 ft/s² and the elevator's upward acceleration of 4.0 ft/s². Participants conclude that the discrepancy in time is likely due to the textbook's rounding of values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically x = x0 + vx0t + 1/2ax(t^2)
  • Knowledge of gravitational acceleration (32 ft/s²) and its application in free fall problems
  • Familiarity with initial velocity concepts in physics, particularly in relation to moving objects
  • Basic understanding of Newton's First Law of Motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of initial velocity on free fall scenarios
  • Learn how to apply kinematic equations in complex motion problems involving multiple accelerations
  • Explore the concept of relative motion in physics, especially in systems with moving reference frames
  • Investigate rounding errors in physics calculations and their impact on problem-solving
USEFUL FOR

Students learning physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and acceleration in real-world scenarios.

  • #61
Doc Al said:
Good. Note that each side is the position with respect to the shaft. You don't know the actual height of the bolt or elevator floor, but all that matters is that the bolt starts off 9 ft higher than the elevator floor. Your equation just assumes that the elevator floor is at position y0 = 0, which is fine. (Who cares?)

Note that if you assumed that the elevator floor was initially at y0 = 25 ft and thus the bolt was at y0 = 25+9 = 34 ft, that nothing would change. The arbitrary 25ft would just drop out of the equation when you solved for the time or the change in position.

But all of your position measurements are with respect to the shaft.

ah I see, thank you very much.

Just to clear something up though, wouldn't x0 = 9 and x1 = 0 be in respect to the elevator floor? Since I know that the bolt is 9 feet above the elevator floor, so 0 would be the elevator floor. On the other hand, in respect to the elevator shaft would be the distance of the bolt above the ground of the elevator shaft?

and how could I have measured it differently in terms of the elevator floor? I'm just not sure how the answer would've been different if I took it with respect to the elevator floor. I know that the position of the bolt after falling is in respect to the elevator floor, since the measurement of 9 feet is in respect to how high the bolt is above the elevator floor.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
emyt said:
Just to clear something up though, wouldn't x0 = 9 and x1 = 0 be in respect to the elevator floor?
It could be either with respect to the shaft or with respect to the elevator floor. The difference in initial position of bolt and elevator is the same from any reference. It's the subsequent position that changes depending on what you're measuring with respect to, not the initial position.

What tells me that you're measuring position with respect to the shaft are the expressions y = 9 +8t -16t^2 (for the bolt) and y = 8t + 2t^2 (for the elevator floor).
 
  • #63
Doc Al said:
It could be either with respect to the shaft or with respect to the elevator floor. The difference in initial position of bolt and elevator is the same from any reference. It's the subsequent position that changes depending on what you're measuring with respect to, not the initial position.

What tells me that you're measuring position with respect to the shaft are the expressions y = 9 +8t -16t^2 (for the bolt) and y = 8t + 2t^2 (for the elevator floor).

ohh, I see, because my equation y= 8t + 2t^2 is the movement of position y from 0 along the elevator shaft. and likewise with my bolt equation, it starts 9 feet above the elevator floor and falls down in respect to the elevator shaft, so if I I picked some appropriate number, you could calculate how the bolt hits the ground of the elevator shaft with that equation. so the equation is really like y = a + 8t + 2t^2 and y = (a+9) + 8t -16y^2 .. Thanks :)

if you don't mind, could you show me an equation like this in respect to the elevator floor, so I can tell the difference in the future?

thanks
 
  • #64
emyt said:
if you don't mind, could you show me an equation like this in respect to the elevator floor, so I can tell the difference in the future?
To find the position of the bolt with respect to the elevator floor, just subtract the two expressions:
y = 9 -18t^2

Of course, the position of the elevator floor with respect to itself is just y = 0.
 
  • #65
Doc Al said:
To find the position of the bolt with respect to the elevator floor, just subtract the two expressions:
y = 9 -18t^2

Of course, the position of the elevator floor with respect to itself is just y = 0.

Right, of course the new distance of the bolt in respect to the elevator floor is just 0, since it hits the floor :P

thanks a lot! I feel like I can tackle any kind of problem like this now :P
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K