Free Fall: Weight & Air Resistance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of free fall, specifically examining the forces at play in scenarios with and without air resistance. Participants explore the nature of gravitational force, acceleration, and the effects of distance from the Earth's center on gravitational pull.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that in free fall without air resistance, the force causing constant acceleration is the object's weight.
  • Others note that acceleration is not truly constant as it can vary with distance from the gravitational source, specifically mentioning that gravitational acceleration decreases with distance.
  • There is a discussion about the acceleration due to gravity being approximately 10 m/s² at sea level, with a later clarification that it is actually about 9.8 m/s².
  • One participant mentions that if one were to fall to the center of the Earth, the acceleration would be zero, prompting questions about gravitational pull being exerted from the center of the Earth.
  • Another participant explains that gravitational pull is exerted by every speck of matter in the Earth and that the net pull behaves differently depending on whether one is inside or outside a uniform shell of mass.
  • There is a clarification that while gravitational pull is directed towards the center of the Earth, the effective gravitational force experienced can vary based on one's position relative to the Earth's center.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of gravitational pull and the implications of distance from the Earth's center. There is no consensus on the specifics of how gravitational force behaves in different scenarios, indicating multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on assumptions about uniformity and spherical symmetry of the Earth, which may not hold true in practice. The discussion also touches on the complexities of gravitational force that are not fully resolved.

Celluhh
Messages
218
Reaction score
0
in free fall without air resistance what is the force that causes the constant acc? Is it the object weight ?
And in free fall with air resistance what is the applied force ? Is it the weight of the object and the resistive force is the air resistance? And the net force is the one that causes the acc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Celluhh said:
in free fall without air resistance what is the force that causes the constant acc? Is it the object weight ?
Yes. Weight is the force exerted by a gravitational field on a mass. But note that the acceleration is never actually constant. As the object gets closer to the source of the gravitational field, the force, and therefore the acceleration, increase.
And in free fall with air resistance what is the applied force ? Is it the weight of the object and the resistive force is the air resistance? And the net force is the one that causes the acc?
Yes.
 
haruspex said:
Yes. Weight is the force exerted by a gravitational field on a mass. But note that the acceleration is never actually constant. As the object gets closer to the source of the gravitational field, the force, and therefore the acceleration, increase.

Huh? But g is 10m/s !
 
Celluhh said:
Huh? But g is 10m/s !
As you move further away from the Earth's surface, the value of g decreases proportional to 1/distance2. Only at sea level is g ~10m/s2. You do have to be very high though until you notice the difference, for the astronauts in the international space station g is still > 9m/s2.
 
If you fell all the way to the center of the earth, your acceleration would be zero - although you would have a very respectable velocity.
 
Chronos said:
If you fell all the way to the center of the earth, your acceleration would be zero - although you would have a very respectable velocity.

Ummm ok, i take it that your point is about tha fact that gravitational pull is exerted from the centre of the earth?
 
Just to double check if what I assume is correct, for free fall without air resistance, the applied force is the weight, the acceleration is g-10m/s , because for resultant force f=ma and in this case weight is the resultant force as there is no air resistance present, so weight divided by the mass of the object gives us the acceleration due to gravity for free fall , right ?
 
Celluhh said:
Just to double check if what I assume is correct, for free fall without air resistance, the applied force is the weight, the acceleration is g-10m/s , because for resultant force f=ma and in this case weight is the resultant force as there is no air resistance present, so weight divided by the mass of the object gives us the acceleration due to gravity for free fall , right ?

Right. However, note that acceleration is measured in meters per second squared, not meters per second. The value on Earth would therefore be 9.8 m/s2.
 
Last edited:
i take it that your point is about tha fact that gravitational pull is exerted from the centre of the earth?

no...only when you are outside the radius of the earth.

In F = ma, when a = g, F = W...so W = mg
 
  • #10
Gravitational pull is definitely exerted from the centre of the Earth. The distances in the equations are measured from the centre of the eARTH...R NOT H !
Inside the Earth, falling down a mine shaft, the pull is still towards the centre but may not be 9.8m/s^2

"We know much, we understand little."
 
  • #11
Emilyjoint said:
Gravitational pull is definitely exerted from the centre of the Earth.
This is not quite true, and can lead to misunderstandings.
The gravitational pull of the Earth is exerted independently by every little speck of matter in it.
If you are outside a uniform hollow shell, it just happens that the net pull of that shell is exactly the same as if the entire mass were concentrated at the shell's centre. This only happens in 3 dimensions. If you are inside the shell, all those individual pulls just happen to cancel out, leaving no net field.
From this, it follows (treating the Earth as uniform and spherical, neither of which is true) that the pull from above Earth's surface at distance r from its centre is proportional to 1/r2, whereas if r is less than the radius of the Earth it is proportional to r.
In practice, the Earth is an oblate spheroid. You are further from the centre when at the equator than when at the poles, but because it's not a sphere, the field does not act as though all the mass were at the centre; the reduction in gravity is less than you might expect based purely on the extra distance from the centre. OTOH, the Earth's spin makes apparent gravity about .3% less.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
796
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
924
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K