Free Particle & Square Well Potential Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kaadshah123456
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Free particle Particle
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
kaadshah123456
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
free particle can be thought of as unbound particle:confused:
and what about square well potential with finite walls? coz it has both bound and unbound states

please help m confused thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition a free particle is a particle that acts as if its the only thing in an inertial frame.

An inertial frame is defined as a frame where all points are the same, all directions are the same, and all instances in time are the same. Without going into the details (you will find it in Landau - Mechanics) that constrains its Lagrangian to be mv^2/2 so the particle moves at a constant velocity. The Hamiltonian is then the same but its more usual to write it as p^2/2m.

You shove that into Schrödinger's equation and you get the wave solution:
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/Users/smithb/website/coursenotes/qi/QILectureNotes3.pdf

You place a particle in a square well potential and its no longer in an inertial frame (all points are no longer the same) - the Hamiltonian is different and you get different solutions to Schroedinger's equation.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
bhobba said:
By definition a free particle is a particle that acts as if its the only thing in an inertial frame.

An inertial frame is defined as a frame where all points are the same, all directions are the same, and all instances in time are the same. Without going into the details (you will find it in Landau - Mechanics) that constrains its Lagrangian to be mv^2/2 so the particle moves at a constant velocity. The Hamiltonian is then the same but its more usual to write it as p^2/2m.

You shove that into Schrödinger's equation and you get the wave solution:
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/Users/smithb/website/coursenotes/qi/QILectureNotes3.pdf

You place a particle in a square well potential and its no longer in an inertial frame (all points are no longer the same) - the Hamiltonian is different and you get different solutions to Schroedinger's equation.

Thanks
Bill
but can you say that free particle is unbound?? acc to definatioms unbound sysyem are those in which particle can go to infinite
 
kaadshah123456 said:
but can you say that free particle is unbound?? acc to definatioms unbound sysyem are those in which particle can go to infinite

That's the same thing as being in an inertial frame. If it can't go to infinity then all points are not the same.

Thanks
Bill
 
:nb) now i und.
thanks lot:)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
From the Physics Forums Global Guidelines:
Pay reasonable attention to written English communication standards. This includes the use of proper grammatical structure, punctuation, capitalization, spacing, and spelling. In particular, "I" is capitalized, there's a space after (but not before) a comma, a period, and other punctuation. Multiple exclamation marks are also discouraged. SMS messaging shorthand ("text-message-speak"), such as using "u" for "you", "please" for "please", or "wanna" for "want to" is not acceptable.