Free Simulator Software for Vacuum Field BVPs | Tom

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the challenges of simulating vacuum field equations, specifically focusing on solving boundary value problems (BVPs) rather than initial value problems (IVPs). Participants explore the requirements for boundary conditions in the context of numerical relativity and seek recommendations for free software capable of such simulations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Tom expresses interest in simulating vacuum field equations with boundary conditions across all spatial and temporal extents, rather than just an initial surface.
  • One participant questions the consistency of specifying boundary conditions on all extremes, suggesting it may not constitute a well-posed problem.
  • Tom acknowledges the possibility of over-constraining the vacuum equations and considers the need to provide fewer constraints or seek a solution that approximates a vacuum state.
  • Tom reiterates the desire for a solver that addresses boundary value problems for the entire 3+1 block, rather than solving forward in time from initial conditions.
  • A participant supports Tom's point by suggesting that providing initial values alone may be sufficient to constrain the boundary value problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the feasibility of specifying boundary conditions for vacuum equations, with some suggesting that it may lead to over-constraining the problem. There is no consensus on the best approach or software for simulating these equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations regarding the consistency of boundary conditions and the implications of over-constraining the vacuum equations, but do not resolve these issues.

TGlad
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am interested in simulating the vacuum field equations, but solving a full boundary value problem rather than the initial value problem. i.e. I might have boundary conditions in all spatial and temporal extents/extremes, rather than just an initial 3D surface.

Does anyone know any free software that could perform such a simulation? I have started looking at the Einstein Toolkit docs and it doesn't really look like it does this, and I don't have much info on GRCombo.

many thanks,

Tom.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TGlad said:
I might have boundary conditions in all spatial and temporal extents/extremes, rather than just an initial 3D surface.
Well, I have no experience with numerical relativity, however, specifying all boundary conditions on all extremes need not be consistent, right? Doesn't sound like a well posed problem numerical issues aside.
 
It seems quite likely I would be over-constraining the vacuum equations, in which case I would need to provide fewer constraints, or allow for the solution closest to a vacuum rather than pure vacuum. But basically I'm after a solver that doesn't solve the usual initial value problem forward in time, but instead solves a boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.
It is totally OK if no-one has any recommendations, that is in itself helpful information.
 
TGlad said:
It seems quite likely I would be over-constraining the vacuum equations, in which case I would need to provide fewer constraints

TGlad said:
I'm after a solver that doesn't solve the usual initial value problem forward in time, but instead solves a boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.

The point that @Paul Colby was suggesting (which I think is valid) is that any attempt to go beyond providing initial value conditions will be over-constraining the equations. Knowing the initial values is already sufficient to constrain the boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K