Free Simulator Software for Vacuum Field BVPs | Tom

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the challenge of simulating vacuum field equations while addressing boundary value problems (BVPs) rather than initial value problems (IVPs). Tom seeks free software capable of handling such simulations, expressing uncertainty about the capabilities of the Einstein Toolkit and GRCombo. Participants highlight the potential issue of over-constraining the vacuum equations when specifying boundary conditions across all spatial and temporal extents, suggesting that fewer constraints may be necessary for a well-posed problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of boundary value problems (BVPs) in numerical relativity
  • Familiarity with vacuum field equations in general relativity
  • Knowledge of initial value problems (IVPs) and their implications
  • Basic experience with simulation software like the Einstein Toolkit
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the capabilities of the Einstein Toolkit for boundary value problem simulations
  • Explore GRCombo and its documentation for potential applications in vacuum field equations
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving boundary value problems in general relativity
  • Learn about the implications of over-constraining equations in numerical simulations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and developers in numerical relativity, physicists interested in vacuum field simulations, and anyone exploring boundary value problems in computational physics.

TGlad
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am interested in simulating the vacuum field equations, but solving a full boundary value problem rather than the initial value problem. i.e. I might have boundary conditions in all spatial and temporal extents/extremes, rather than just an initial 3D surface.

Does anyone know any free software that could perform such a simulation? I have started looking at the Einstein Toolkit docs and it doesn't really look like it does this, and I don't have much info on GRCombo.

many thanks,

Tom.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TGlad said:
I might have boundary conditions in all spatial and temporal extents/extremes, rather than just an initial 3D surface.
Well, I have no experience with numerical relativity, however, specifying all boundary conditions on all extremes need not be consistent, right? Doesn't sound like a well posed problem numerical issues aside.
 
It seems quite likely I would be over-constraining the vacuum equations, in which case I would need to provide fewer constraints, or allow for the solution closest to a vacuum rather than pure vacuum. But basically I'm after a solver that doesn't solve the usual initial value problem forward in time, but instead solves a boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.
It is totally OK if no-one has any recommendations, that is in itself helpful information.
 
TGlad said:
It seems quite likely I would be over-constraining the vacuum equations, in which case I would need to provide fewer constraints

TGlad said:
I'm after a solver that doesn't solve the usual initial value problem forward in time, but instead solves a boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.

The point that @Paul Colby was suggesting (which I think is valid) is that any attempt to go beyond providing initial value conditions will be over-constraining the equations. Knowing the initial values is already sufficient to constrain the boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K