Graduate Free Simulator Software for Vacuum Field BVPs | Tom

Click For Summary
Tom seeks free software for simulating vacuum field equations with a focus on solving boundary value problems rather than initial value problems. He notes that specifying boundary conditions across all spatial and temporal extents may lead to over-constraining the equations, potentially making the problem ill-posed. Discussions highlight that knowing initial values can sufficiently constrain the boundary value problem for the entire 3+1 block. Tom expresses that any recommendations for suitable software would be appreciated, but acknowledges that the lack of suggestions is also informative. The conversation emphasizes the challenges of formulating boundary conditions in numerical relativity.
TGlad
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am interested in simulating the vacuum field equations, but solving a full boundary value problem rather than the initial value problem. i.e. I might have boundary conditions in all spatial and temporal extents/extremes, rather than just an initial 3D surface.

Does anyone know any free software that could perform such a simulation? I have started looking at the Einstein Toolkit docs and it doesn't really look like it does this, and I don't have much info on GRCombo.

many thanks,

Tom.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TGlad said:
I might have boundary conditions in all spatial and temporal extents/extremes, rather than just an initial 3D surface.
Well, I have no experience with numerical relativity, however, specifying all boundary conditions on all extremes need not be consistent, right? Doesn't sound like a well posed problem numerical issues aside.
 
It seems quite likely I would be over-constraining the vacuum equations, in which case I would need to provide fewer constraints, or allow for the solution closest to a vacuum rather than pure vacuum. But basically I'm after a solver that doesn't solve the usual initial value problem forward in time, but instead solves a boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.
It is totally OK if no-one has any recommendations, that is in itself helpful information.
 
TGlad said:
It seems quite likely I would be over-constraining the vacuum equations, in which case I would need to provide fewer constraints

TGlad said:
I'm after a solver that doesn't solve the usual initial value problem forward in time, but instead solves a boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.

The point that @Paul Colby was suggesting (which I think is valid) is that any attempt to go beyond providing initial value conditions will be over-constraining the equations. Knowing the initial values is already sufficient to constrain the boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K