A Free Simulator Software for Vacuum Field BVPs | Tom

TGlad
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
Hi, I am interested in simulating the vacuum field equations, but solving a full boundary value problem rather than the initial value problem. i.e. I might have boundary conditions in all spatial and temporal extents/extremes, rather than just an initial 3D surface.

Does anyone know any free software that could perform such a simulation? I have started looking at the Einstein Toolkit docs and it doesn't really look like it does this, and I don't have much info on GRCombo.

many thanks,

Tom.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TGlad said:
I might have boundary conditions in all spatial and temporal extents/extremes, rather than just an initial 3D surface.
Well, I have no experience with numerical relativity, however, specifying all boundary conditions on all extremes need not be consistent, right? Doesn't sound like a well posed problem numerical issues aside.
 
It seems quite likely I would be over-constraining the vacuum equations, in which case I would need to provide fewer constraints, or allow for the solution closest to a vacuum rather than pure vacuum. But basically I'm after a solver that doesn't solve the usual initial value problem forward in time, but instead solves a boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.
It is totally OK if no-one has any recommendations, that is in itself helpful information.
 
TGlad said:
It seems quite likely I would be over-constraining the vacuum equations, in which case I would need to provide fewer constraints

TGlad said:
I'm after a solver that doesn't solve the usual initial value problem forward in time, but instead solves a boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.

The point that @Paul Colby was suggesting (which I think is valid) is that any attempt to go beyond providing initial value conditions will be over-constraining the equations. Knowing the initial values is already sufficient to constrain the boundary value problem for the whole 3+1 block.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top