Frequency & Length of Resonating Pipes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between the frequency of sound and the length of resonating pipes is defined by inverse proportionality, where an increase in frequency corresponds to a decrease in wavelength. In the discussion, data from closed pipes (384Hz, 19.8cm; 426.7Hz, 19.9cm; 480Hz, 18.7cm) and open pipes (256Hz, 71.8cm; 288Hz, 58.4cm) suggests a trend that may not be immediately apparent without graphical representation. The fundamental frequency is directly proportional to the wavelength, meaning the length of the pipe must correspond to the wavelength of the sound wave. Measurement errors or experimental conditions may have influenced the data, but the calculated speed of sound at 341 m/s aligns closely with accepted values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound wave properties and behavior
  • Familiarity with the concepts of wavelength and frequency
  • Knowledge of closed and open pipe resonance
  • Basic graphing skills for data visualization
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the mathematical relationship between frequency, wavelength, and pipe length
  • Explore the principles of sound wave resonance in closed and open pipes
  • Investigate common sources of error in sound wave experiments
  • Study graphical analysis techniques for interpreting experimental data
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, acoustics researchers, and anyone conducting experiments related to sound wave behavior and resonance in pipes.

mgiddy911
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
I have completed a lab on sound waves in which we measured the speed of sound in air(a vaccum) by measuring the lengths of pipes that would resonate tunning forks fundamental frequencies. One question I am asked to answer is to describe the relationship between the frequency of a sound and the length of a pipe that resonates it and explain why the relationship is what is it. By looking at my datd I can't see a relation between the two...
(384Hz, 19.8cm) (426.7Hz, 19.9cm) (480Hz, 18.7cm) those were closed pipes and then (256Hz, 71.8cm) and (288Hz, 58.4cm) those were open pipes. From that data I don't see a relation between the frequency and the length that resonates it, am I missing somehting or did I just come up with bad data, mind you when I calculated the speed of sound I came up with an average of 341 m/s so It was farily close to the accepted value.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mgiddy911 said:
(384Hz, 19.8cm) (426.7Hz, 19.9cm) (480Hz, 18.7cm) those were closed pipes and then (256Hz, 71.8cm) and (288Hz, 58.4cm) those were open pipes. From that data I don't see a relation between the frequency and the length that resonates it, am I missing somehting or did I just come up with bad data, mind you when I calculated the speed of sound I came up with an average of 341 m/s so It was farily close to the accepted value.
It looks to me like your open pipes correspond to 1/2 wavelengths. Your closed pipes are approximately 1/4 wavelengths. The data seems to be a little off though.

AM
 


The relationship between the frequency of a sound and the length of a pipe that resonates it is a direct relationship. This means that as the frequency of the sound increases, the length of the pipe that resonates it also increases. This is known as the inverse proportionality law.

In your data, it may seem like there is no relationship between the two because the changes in frequency and length are not consistent. However, if you plot the data on a graph, you will see that there is a general trend where as the frequency increases, the length also increases.

The reason for this relationship is due to the fact that the length of the pipe determines the wavelength of the sound wave that can resonate within it. The fundamental frequency of a sound wave is directly proportional to its wavelength. Therefore, as the frequency increases, the wavelength decreases. In order for a pipe to resonate a specific frequency, its length must be proportionate to the wavelength of that frequency.

In your lab, it is possible that there were some errors in measurement or experimental conditions that may have affected the data. However, your calculated speed of sound being close to the accepted value suggests that your data is fairly accurate.

In conclusion, there is a direct relationship between the frequency of a sound and the length of a pipe that resonates it. This is due to the inverse proportionality between frequency and wavelength. Your data may not show a clear relationship, but it is likely that there is a general trend that can be observed when plotted on a graph.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K