Frequency of Oscillation, with mass and k value given

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mass-spring system where a mass of 2.0 kg is attached to a spring with a force constant of 990 N/m. The objective is to determine the frequency of oscillation after displacing the mass from its equilibrium position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the frequency using the formulas for angular frequency and frequency, expressing concern over the rounding of their answer. They question whether they have chosen the correct formulas and if the mention of equilibrium affects their approach.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the calculations made by the original poster, suggesting that the discrepancy in the expected answer may stem from a potential error in the answer key. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's concerns regarding understanding the problem fully in preparation for their final exam.

Contextual Notes

The original poster references a previous problem involving velocity and angles, indicating a possible confusion about the relevance of equilibrium in this context. They express anxiety about their performance on an upcoming exam that significantly impacts their grade.

LaLaLina
Messages
4
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A mass m = 2.0 kg is attached to a spring having a force constant k = 990 N/m as in the figure. The mass is displaced from its equilibrium position and released. Its frequency of oscillation (in Hz) is approximately _____ . [/B]
upload_2014-12-5_17-52-8.png


Homework Equations


\omega=\sqrt\frac{k}{m}
T=\frac{2\pi}{\omega} f=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}
[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



m= 2.0 kg
k= 990 N/m
f = ?
omega = sqrt((990N/m)/(2.0kg)) = 22.25 rad/s
f= (22.25 rad/s)/(2pi) = 3.5 Hz

The answer to the problem, is 4.0 Hz. However, I don't believe I should have rounded up. I believe I have made an error in how to solve the problem.

Have I gone wrong in choosing the formulas to use? or
Should I have taken something else into account based on the mention of the equilibrium statement? and if so, what does that imply?
I recall doing another type of spring problem where it went past its point of equilibrium, but we were using velocity and its angle and solving for v using
dy/dt = -A(omega)sin(omega(t)+phi), however I was reviewing the slides before this problem, and it doesn't seem to address the equilibrium.

I thank you for your assistance very much. I'm studying for my final on Monday and I'm trying to be prepared.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi LaLaLina, Welcome to Physics Forums.

Your solution method and result look fine. It's possible that at some point someone changed a parameter in the problem in order to make it a "new" problem, but didn't update the answer key.
 
your calculation looks fine to me. 3.5 Hz is correct to 2 significant figures and 4 Hz is correct to 1 significant figure. Although, it is weird that your teacher (or professor or book) wrote 4.0 Hz, since this would usually imply 2 significant figures of precision... maybe it is just an error in the book like gneill says
 
Thank you so much. I got an email back from him, and he said I did wonderful. That it was supposed to be an approximation. So, there in lies the answer I guess. I on the other hand am sitting here worrying my brain out over knowing how to do a problem correctly with this final coming up that is 30% of my grade, so I wanted to make SURE I knew what I was doing.

Thank you both for your feedback.I feel much better now.
 
Glad we could help. That's what Physics Forums is all about :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BruceW and LaLaLina
Oh my! I just now noticed the T.A.R.D.I.S.
fellow Whovian in the house!

Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
996
Replies
2
Views
1K