Fresnel reflection coefficient for Second Harmonic Generation (SHG)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Fresnel reflection coefficient for second harmonic generation (SHG) in GaN crystals, referencing the work of J. Jerphagnon and S. K. Kurtz. The original poster seeks clarification on the transmission coefficient's definition, questioning why it is not simply the absolute value squared. The conversation highlights the necessity of considering the complex refractive indices at frequencies ω and 2ω, as the bound and free waves exhibit different refractive properties. A suggestion is made to refer to Appendix A of the cited paper for the derivation of the transmission coefficient.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second harmonic generation (SHG)
  • Familiarity with Fresnel equations and transmission coefficients
  • Knowledge of complex refractive indices
  • Basic principles of wave propagation in nonlinear optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of Fresnel coefficients in nonlinear optics
  • Study the paper by J. Jerphagnon and S. K. Kurtz for detailed insights
  • Explore the implications of complex refractive indices in SHG
  • Investigate the role of GaN crystals in photonic applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, graduate students, and professionals in optics and photonics, particularly those focusing on nonlinear optical phenomena and materials like GaN.

Jose Antonio
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, this is my first post so I don't know whether or not this is the right thread to be asking this question (if so I am sorry). I am currently working on my thesis where I am determining the thickness of a GaN crystal through second harmonic generation. However in a article published by J. Jerphagnon and S. K. Kurtz, they defined a Fresnel-like transmission coefficient for the second harmonic signal as:

Screenshot_from_2016_09_01_10_36_54.png


I was wondering if anyone knew a source of how to get this result. I am intrigued on why this transmission coefficient is not the absolute value squared (since it is a capital T) since one could be considering the complex form of the refractive indices. Thanks in advance for any response!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Jose Antonio said:
However in a article published by J. Jerphagnon and S. K. Kurtz,

Could you please post a proper citation for the above? Thanks in advance.
 
I do understand that both transmission and reflection coefficients do somehow need to include both refractive indices at frequencies ω and 2ω, since the bound and free waves have different refractive indices and the solution of the inhomogeneous solution is the sum of the homogeneous solution (free wave) and particular solution (bound wave), however I can't seem to find any source where this result is deduced (and I certainly do can't find a way to find it myself).
 
Last edited:
Jose Antonio said:
I do understand that both transmission and reflection coefficients do somehow need to include both refractive indices at frequencies ω and 2ω, since the bound and free waves have different refractive indices and the solution of the inhomogeneous solution is the sum of the homogeneous solution (free wave) and particular solution (bound wave), however I can't seem to find any source where this result is deduced (and I certainly do can't find a way to find it myself).

Yeesh... rough paper. Looks like the derivation is in Appendix A.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K