Friction between two stacked objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Panphobia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the frictional forces acting between two stacked objects, specifically focusing on a 6 kg square and a hanging mass. Participants are exploring the conditions under which friction acts, particularly in scenarios of equilibrium and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the magnitude of frictional forces and how they relate to the weights and accelerations of the objects involved. Questions about equilibrium conditions and the nature of friction (static vs. kinetic) are raised.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights on the relationship between friction and the forces acting on the objects. There is an acknowledgment of the complexities involved when considering different scenarios, such as equilibrium versus acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the frictional force may vary depending on whether the system is in equilibrium or accelerating, and there is mention of the need to consider multiple frictional interactions within the system.

Panphobia
Messages
435
Reaction score
13
vebu37.png


There is friction in between the two stacked objects, but no where else.

Now what I was wondering was when I draw the fbd for the 6 kg square, there is a frictional force in left direction, but is the magnitude of it m1g*coefficient of friction, so (4)(9.8)μ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This depends on the hanging mass. If they are in equilibrium (not moving) then I would say you are correct. Otherwise you would need to take into consideration the accelerations.
 
Panphobia said:
vebu37.png


There is friction in between the two stacked objects, but no where else.

Now what I was wondering was when I draw the fbd for the 6 kg square, there is a frictional force in left direction, but is the magnitude of it m1g*coefficient of friction, so (4)(9.8)μ?

What is the mass of the hanging ball?

for fbd for 6kg mass, there would be normal forces from floor and mass m1, weight and friction whose direction is towards the left in your situation. the direction is independent of weight of ball. But magnitude depends on it. if its accelerating or on the verge of moving, then you are correct because you have used the condition for max friction. But if the objects are in equilibrium, then friction could range from 0 to max value depending on the mass of hanging weight.

------------------------------------------------------

Legaldose said:
If they are in equilibrium (not moving) then I would say you are correct. Otherwise you would need to take into consideration the accelerations.
it should depend on the conditions of equilibrium, the answer should be correct only if the block is on the verge of moving. And even considering the acceleration, if there is any, answer should be right given that coefficient of friction doesn't change. Only tension should change for different accelerations. what do you think?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I was saying what was weird is that I have to incorporate friction twice, once on the top object and once on the bottom object, and this is kinetic friction "Legaldose", not static friction. Also the system IS accelerating to the right or down.
 
Panphobia said:
I was saying what was weird is that I have to incorporate friction twice, once on the top object and once on the bottom object, and this is kinetic friction "Legaldose", not static friction. Also the system IS accelerating to the right or down.

it is not at all weird...it is a consequence of Newton's third law
 
so the magnitude of this friction is the exact same in both cases correct?
 
Panphobia said:
so the magnitude of this friction is the exact same in both cases correct?

:approve: yes, exactly
 
I KNEW IT :D, just wanted to make sure I was doing it right :)
 
Panphobia said:
I KNEW IT :D, just wanted to make sure I was doing it right :)

great then, glad I could help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K