Friction Coefficient for Slope Equilibrium: tan(a)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FabledIntg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Slope
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the required friction coefficient (f_k) for a body to remain in equilibrium on a sloping plane with angle alpha. The correct relationship is established as f_k = tan(a), contrasting with the initial incorrect assumption that f_k = 1/cos(a). Key insights include the necessity of considering both the normal force and friction in equilibrium equations, as well as the importance of free body diagrams in visualizing the forces acting on the body.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic trigonometry, specifically sine and cosine functions.
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams and their application in physics.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of normal force and friction in mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of equilibrium conditions in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the friction equation: f_k = μN, where μ is the friction coefficient and N is the normal force.
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams for various physical scenarios.
  • Explore the implications of different surface materials on friction coefficients.
  • Investigate the role of gravitational forces in inclined plane problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of forces on inclined planes and equilibrium conditions.

FabledIntg
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Problem:

A body lays still on a sloping plane with slope angle alpha. How high does the friction coefficient need to be in order to allow for this equlibrium?

Thoughts:

I attempted solving this by basic trig. cos(a) = oposing/hypothenuse. So say the opposing is 1 unit, then the friction coefficient f_k needs to balance the vector acting in the direction of the hypotenuse downwards. So:

cos(a) = 1/f_k

f_k = 1/cos(a).

However the answer is supposed to be f_k = tan(a). How come?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track that the "friction" needs to balance the "vector" acting along the hypotenuse. What you are missing is that the friction is a function of the normal force as well as the friction coefficient.

Start by drawing a free body diagram of the body on the slope.
 
paisiello2 said:
You are on the right track that the "friction" needs to balance the "vector" acting along the hypotenuse. What you are missing is that the friction is a function of the normal force as well as the friction coefficient.

Start by drawing a free body diagram of the body on the slope.

Hi, thanks for your reply. I'm not sure how I should proceed after drawing the free body diagram? Obviously the body is affected by vertical gravitational pull F=mg and another force parallell to the horizontal ground plane. The resultant of these two forces is the force acting on the body in the direction of the hypotenuse?
 
What is "another force"?
 
The horizontal component of the vector parallell to the hypotenuse?
 
OK, but does this vector have a name?

Can you provide an attempt at drawing the free body diagram?
 
See attached. Calculating by it I get something like

\sin\alpha = \frac{F_v}{F_k} \ \Rightarrow \ \cos\alpha = \frac{F_h}{F_k}= \frac{F_h}{F_v/\sin\alpha}

which gives me an expression for Fh as

F_h = F_v\frac{\cos\alpha}{\sin\alpha} = F_v\cot\alpha.

Setting the two Fk's, expressed in sin and cos respectively, equal it yeilds

\frac{F_v}{\sin\alpha} = \frac{F_h}{\cos\alpha} \ \Leftrightarrow \ \frac{F_v}{\sin\alpha} = \frac{F_v\frac{\cos\alpha}{\sin\alpha}}{\cos\alpha},

Which just teaches me that sin a = sin a, as if I didin't know that.
 

Attachments

  • Free body.png
    Free body.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 356
I think you're making it way harder than it needs to be. I also think it's good to go down these dead ends every once in a while as it will help you avoid them in the future.

First that freebody diagram isn't any good. How is that block going to move based on the lengths and directions of the forces?
 
Not sure what you're asking? It's going to move in the direction of Fk?
 
  • #10
Looking again, the motion might end up alright, but I still don't like it. I have no idea what you're calling your forces and there's a little bit of inconsistancy in there.
 
  • #11
There are 2 things that are exerting a force on the block. What are they?
 
  • #12
Gravity and friction?
 
  • #13
No, those aren't things. Hint, gravity comes from the earth. Where does friction come from?
 
  • #14
Surface? It comes when two surfaces move in relation to each other in different directions. I feel like a donkey now to be honest, I know what friction is but I'm not sure what you want me to realize is relevant to the problem.
 
  • #15
Is friction the only force that comes from the surface?

Or,
What is the equation for friction?
 
  • #16
And don't feel bad. You're overlooking something simple, and overcomplicating the problem. I'm not trying to make you feel stupid, just realize what you overlooked =]
 
  • #17
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Is friction the only force that comes from the surface?

Or,
What is the equation for friction?

What about the normal force perpendicular to the surface? But I'm not sure how to draw out the relevant forces on the free body diagram?
 
  • #18
Yea the normal is what I was getting at. You have a normal Force, a frictional force, and a gravitational force. You want the system to be in equilibrium, so what does this mean mathematically?

In other words, give me an example of an equation of a system that's in equilibrium.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K