Friction constant minimizing the duration of vertical motion

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the optimal friction constant (c) for a car's suspension system to minimize vertical motion duration after encountering bumps. The governing equation is mx'' + cx' + kx = F(t), where the mass is 100 kg and the spring constant is 10^4 N/m. Critical damping is noted as a potential solution, but participants suggest that some underdamping might allow for faster recovery from disturbances. There is confusion regarding the conditions for minimizing the damping ratio, particularly when c^2 - 4mk is less than or greater than zero. Ultimately, the goal is to find a balance that minimizes vertical motion effectively without compromising system stability.
TheRealPhone
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The mass of a car that acts on one wheel is 100 kg. The elasticity (spring) constant in the suspension system of that wheel is k = 10^4N/m. Design the strut (find the friction/resistance constant c) such that any vertical motion of the wheel (set up for example by going over a bump or pothole on the road) will die out in the shortest amount of time.

Homework Equations


mx′′+cx′+kx=F(t)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have determined that the equation that we will most likely be using is mx''+cx'+kx=F(t) where F is some force. I at first thought that I should look at it at the critically damped point or where c^2-4mk=0 but I thought it was to simple and didn't make sense for this situation. Overall very confused and could use some assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Phone, welcome to PF :smile: !

Critical damping ( ##\zeta =1 ## ) is often a bit too much and too stiff, but what damping ratio (*) is optimum depends on the criteria (an error band, or the integral of deviation squared or something). Since your exercise asks for a single constant, alternatives like nonlinear damping are ruled out. So depending on your context, the simple solution might be the right one. The "critically damped response is the response that reaches the steady-state value the fastest without being underdamped" (from wiki). Key is this last restriction: you can accept some underdamping if it makes the system recover faster from a bump.

(*) Note that the picture here is a step response; you probably want to optimize the pulse response.
 
Thanks for the response,

I tried setting up a system of equations that may indeed minimize it using underdamping aswell. The problem is that while c^2-4mk <= 0 the functions is obviously decreasing but when you look at when it is greater then 0 it ends up increasing which would be the damping from the bottom side. I'm having trouble now finding where I could minimize this thought so that the time could be minimized.
 
Underdamping is not the same as negative damping ! For all ##\zeta > 0## there is damping !
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
22K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K