Friction force : determining coefficient of friction

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction for an ice-hockey puck that rebounds after striking a boundary fence. The initial speed of the puck is 6 m/s, and it rebounds at 0.75 times that speed. The user attempted to apply Newton's second law to determine the force during the collision but struggled to find the time taken for the puck to travel the rink's length. Suggestions were made to try an energy balance approach instead. Clarification was requested on the calculations, particularly the origin of the 0.25 value used in the user's equations.
kakaiwasula
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Missing homework template due to originally being posted in a different forum.
I have tried this question but I seem not to be getting any where.
Qn; An ice-hockey puck is struck from one end of a rink of length 27 m towards the other end. The initial speed is 6m/s, and the puck rebounds from the boundary fence at the other end with a speed which is 0.75 times the speed with which it struck the fence, before just returning to the starting point. Calculate the coefficient of friction between the puck and the ice.
My attempt:
I applied Newtons second law at instant of collision with fence to get force from rate of change in momentum. this is in terms of mass m and time t, ie 0.25m/t. Equating this force to frictional force gives the coefficient in terms of t after m cancels out.. Applyinng SUVAT seems not to get me anywhere near to geting the time t for the puck to travel 27m, nor the time of impact.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should post this in the homework section.
But anyways, try energy balance and see if that works.
 
kakaiwasula said:
I applied Newtons second law at instant of collision with fence to get force from rate of change in momentum. this is in terms of mass m and time t, ie 0.25m/t. Equating this force to frictional force gives the coefficient in terms of t after m cancels out.. Applyinng SUVAT seems not to get me anywhere near to geting the time t for the puck to travel 27m, nor the time of impact.
Not sure I understand your description of what you have done so far. Where does the 0.25 come from? Please post the working.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K