Friction Questions: Concepts & Answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter desichick07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the coefficients of static and kinetic friction, confirming that the coefficient of static friction is always greater because it requires more force to initiate movement than to maintain it. The second question addresses whether smoother surfaces always exhibit less friction than rougher ones, with the consensus being that this is not always true, as it depends on the materials involved. A rough surface can sometimes have a lower coefficient of friction than a smooth one due to molecular adhesion dynamics. The conversation emphasizes that generalizations about friction must consider specific interactions between surfaces. Overall, the insights gained from the lab reinforce the complexity of frictional forces beyond simplistic comparisons.
desichick07
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble with two concept questions.

We did a lab measuring static and dynamic friction for cardboard, rubber, sandpaper, and cork with a wood block.
Calculations show that the coefficient of static friction is always greater that that of kinetic friction.

The questions are:
a) How do the coeffients of static and kinetic frictions compare? Explain.
My answer was that the coeff. of static friction is always greater, reason being that it takes a greater force to get an object to start moving from rest (acceleration), which is when static f. was measured, versus just keeping an object moving (a = 0).

b) Do "smoother" surfaces always have less friction than "rougher" ones?
Ans: No, because it depends on the other surface they are interacting with??

I have tried to answer them, but if someone could just check and point out what is wrong I would appreciate it. I think i got the first question right but I'm pretty sure the second one is wrong.I really don't know how to answer b.
What are the concepts behind the second one? Because i truly don't even know where to start with that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must have learned from the lab, right? A rough surface can have a smaller coefficient of friction than a smooth one. The ultimate source of friction is adhesion between groups of molecules and a smooth surface can put a lot more molecules in close proximity than a rough one. There are, of course, exceptions to every rule, but to say ALWAYS is just plain wrong. Your answer is right.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K